Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Toxic Empathy is a Thing

 

Monday, March 2, 2026

Revisting the transgender books on our library shelves

 By Gretchen Garrity

From the article referenced:

"In a historic and groundbreaking ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court today granted the Thomas More Society’s emergency application in Mirabelli v. Bonta, holding that secret gender transition policies in schools violate the religious liberty and due process rights of parents. The ruling restores the class action injunction that Thomas More Society had secured against the State of California for parents across the state who object to the state’s directives requiring schools to conceal children’s gender transitions from their own parents, facilitate those transitions without parental knowledge or consent, and compel teachers to actively deceive families.

The landmark 6-3 decision is the most significant parental rights ruling in a generation. The Court found that California’s secret transition regime likely violates parents’ rights under both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, holding that the state “cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents.”

Below are some of the books STILL ACCESSIBLE TO CHILDREN IN OUR LIBRARY. Why are they not relocated? At the behest of Christian County taxpayers, our county commissioners appointed board members whose focus was protecting children and making sexually explicit and age-inappropriate books accessible only to the adults in their lives.

Why, after months of discussion and a new executive director, is there not a collection policy for children and teens? Why would a policy need to be implemented on an "incremental" basis? What possible reason could there be to delay providing a policy that would help the library make informed decisions on books for our children? Something is rotten in the state of Denmark, to quote Shakespeare's Hamlet.

Sunday, March 1, 2026

Dystopian Truth

From: Hollywood Reporter
 When you are faced with the reality of what is happening in our state and nation, it is intolerable to be a pro-life incrementalist. Voting for the 2026 Amendment 3 is not the solution. Click through to read the whole tweet. Soylent Green level horror:

SJR72 (Senate Joint Resolution) will be heard in our legislature on Monday at 1p.m., Senate Hearing Room 1.  Witness forms can be filled out and submitted here:

https://www.libertytools.org/LibertyTools/witness/witness2.php?template=139

SJR 72 is a constitutional amendment that should be on our ballot in November. There is no reason why it cannot go forth with the execrable Amendment 3 so voters can vote on both. SJR72 states in part:

"That the term "person" under this constitution includes every human being with a unique DNA code regardless of age, including every in utero human child at every stage of biological development from the moment of conception until birth."