"A little more flexibility"

By Gretchen Garrity

A local citizen has gleaned information regarding changes to the Christian County Library's bylaws in 2021. The clip below (prompted) details that a newly-drafted bylaw, Art. VIII Scope of Authority, was shared by the executive director to the board attorney and later approved by the new Board.

Here was the situation in August of 2021. Between April and August of 2021, four new board members began their terms: Matthew Suarez, Paula Bishop, Kristal Hicks, and Allyson Tuckness, respectively. Current board member Janis Hagen began her term in May 2020. The executive director was hired in April and began work on May 17, 2021.

It is interesting that the new executive director was almost immediately involved in the process of updating, changing and adding to the Board's bylaws. State statute says the board of trustees itself "...shall make and adopt such bylaws, rules and regulations for their own guidance as may be expedient, not inconsistent with law, for the government of the library and in general shall carry out the spirit and intent of sections 182.010 to 182.120 in establishing and maintaining the free county library." 

According to the board minutes in 2021, it is not until the June 21, 2021 board meeting are "Bylaw Revisions--First Review" mentioned under New Business. At that time the board approved the draft presented, pending attorney review. At the July 26, 2021 meeting, the minutes state, "Executive Director Brumett presented another possible revised version of the Bylaw revisions approved at June's regular meeting that incorporated new suggestions from the Library's attorney. As none of the changes were substantive, or would affect the legality or efficacy of the first draft, the Board was able to discuss which wording they preferred.

Matthew Suarez then moved to approve the version that incorporated the Attorney's suggestions and bring that second version to a formal and final vote at the August regular meeting." The motion was approved.

Then, at the August 23, 2021 meeting, a second reading of the bylaw revisions was voted upon with "revisions as presented." It passed.

Besides Art. VIII Scope of Authority that is detailed in the clip, there were several other changes that shed some light on how the library's staff administers the library.

According to a July 19, 2021 email obtained through the Sunshine Law, Executive Director Renee Brumett writes to Board attorney, Harry Styron, that "...the board reviewed a first reading of a bylaws revision in June. I've attached a document containing the new version and the old version. Would you be able to do a quick review and make sure there is nothing specifically illegal or inadvisable in it? Most of the changes were in response to specific requests from the board due to things that came up in the last year. Tory and I proposed a few changes to allow a little more flexibility on a few things. All of the edits or additions are highlighted."

It would be helpful to know which changes were requested from the board, and which board bylaw changes were proposed by the executive director and staff member.  

Art. II, Sec. IX is an interesting bylaw. It was added in as an entirely new section of Art. II. While the board attorney recommended different wording, the bylaw was left largely as is and passed. However, state statute says, "Vacancies in the board occasioned by removals, resignations or otherwise shall be reported to the county commission and shall be filled in like manner as original appointments; except that if the vacancy is in an unexpired term, the appointment shall be made for only the unexpired portion of that term."

That phrase, "term renewal" was questioned by Board attorney Styron in his response on July 20, 2021. He said, "I don't know of any reason to mention reappointment."

Reappointments or renewals of trustee positions seemed important to either the previous board or the administrative staff.

 

 Next, Art. III, Sec. III Quorum, Attendance & Removal, is a new section added to the bylaw revisions in 2021. The original draft described the Board of Trustees as "public representatives and administrative agents of the Library..."

Attorney Styron comments in his July 20 response, "The first sentence states that the Trustees are "administrative agents" of the Library. I do not believe that this term is consistent with the function of the Trustees as established in Article VIII, which limits the functions of the Trustees being members of a board that employs an Executive Director to do all the administration." The term "administrative agents" was removed from the proposed bylaw in the second draft.

What is important to understand is the attorney noted the other newly-drafted bylaw, Art. VIII Scope of Authority "limits the functions of the Trustees" since it gives to the Executive Director "all the administration" of the library. The implications of bylaw changes limiting the governing authority of the board itself is troubling since the board is publicly-appointed on behalf of taxpaying citizens to properly govern the Christian County Library District.

Lastly, Art. VIII, Sec. II states, "Just as the Executive Director regularly evaluates the staff, it is the responsibility of the Board of Trustees to evaluate the Library's Director's effectiveness in providing library services to the Community."

Attorney Styron commented in part, "The Board's evaluation of the Executive Director on "effectiveness in providing library services," limits the Board unnecessarily. The Executive Director could be doing well in providing library services, but might be excelling or misbehaving in significant other ways."

Despite the attorney's advice, the bylaw was passed without change. That seems to conflict with the meeting minutes: "Matthew Suarez then moved to approve the version that incorporated the Attorney's suggestions and bring that second version to a formal and final vote at the August regular meeting."

It may be there was another email exchange between Executive Director Brumett and attorney Styron that provided for a different set of suggestions for the August meeting where a final vote on revisions was made. However, the fact the board was either unaware of their responsibility to "make and adopt such bylaws...for their own guidance," or they felt comfortable passing off at least part of that responsibility to the executive director, is problematic. 

In the end, it appears in 2021 the board of trustees gave up some of their authority to the executive director of the library.

Defending Children from Transgender Ideology in the Christian County Library

 

I laid into gender ideology very hard at this library board meeting and stood up for kids. I'm sick of this gender nonsense. pic.twitter.com/X86kZsydTV

— Chris ✡️🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈 (@midwesthomo77) October 23, 2024

Gender Pushers

There are many books in our Christian County Library that push gender ideology on children as young as toddlers. Below this heartbreaking video is a list of close to 30 books currently in the CCL. Tonight, at the monthly CCL board meeting (6 p.m. at the Nixa branch), there will be activists who think it is evil to keep these books out of the hands of children. They will be there to call other citizens names like "Bigot," "Nazi," "White Christian Nationalist," and "Fascist." Protecting children is not for the faint of heart.

Watch:

Tragic https://t.co/CM49CXMwgu

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2024

 

• The Pronoun Books, for ages 3 and under (Tags: Gender, Gender Identity, Gender studies, Diversity, Early Reader)

• Antiracist Baby, for ages 0-4 (Tags: Social justice, activism, race relations, diversity)

• I’m Not a Girl, for ages 3-6 years (Tags: Transgender, Gender Identity, Acceptance)

• Books like My Fade is Fresh, for ages 3-7. (Tags: Gender non-conforming)

• Small Knight and the Anxiety Monster for ages 4-8. (Tags: Gender non-conforming)

• My Moms Love Me, for ages 3-5. (The baby is described as "ungendered" in a review on the Coolcat website.) Publishers Weekly, May 2, 2022

• Julian is a Mermaid, for ages 4-8 years. (Gender non-conforming)

• Julian at the Wedding, for ages 4-8 years. (Gender non-conforming)

• When Aidan became a Brother, for ages 4-8 years. (Tags: Gender, Transgender)

• I Am Jazz, for ages 4-8 years. (Tags: Transgender, Self-acceptance)

• It Feels Good to be Yourself, for ages 4-8 years. (Tags: Gender Identity, Transgender)

• It’s Okay to be Different, for ages 3-6 (Social Emotional Learning)

• Racial Justice: Let us March On! For ages 4-8 years. (Social Justice)

• I Love You Because I Love You, for ages 4-8 years (Tags: Gender Identity, Social Justice, Harmony)

• Were I Not a Girl, for ages 4-8 years (Tags: Gender Issues, Male Impersonators, Trans)

• The Young Activist’s Dictionary of Social Justice, for ages 7-12. (Tags: Social Justice, Gun Control, Gender Transition, Organizing, Climate Justice, Racism)

• Rainbow Revolutionaries, for ages 8-12 (Tags: Gender identity, diversity, pride activism)

• Pride: The Story of Harvey Milk and the Rainbow Flag, for ages 5-8 years (Tags: Pride, Activism, Social Justice)

• The Every Body Book, for ages 7-12 years, (Tags: Gender, Gender Expression, Reproductive Health, Sex)

• Anne: An Adaptation of Anne of Green Gables (sort of), ages 8-12 years (Tags: LGBTQIA, Relationship, Graphic Novels)

• Stand Up and Speak Out Against Racism, for ages 9-12 years (Tags: Multi-culturalism, Social issues, Race)

• A Snake Falls to Earth, for ages 10-14 (Tags: Asexual, Climate Change, Magic, Spirits)

• Identity: A Story of Transitioning, for ages 11 and up (Tags: Gender, Juvenile, Graphic Novel)

• Beyond the Gender Binary, for ages 12 and up (Tags: Social justice, Gender Theory, Gender Nonconforming, Queer Studies, Gender Fluid)

• Stay Gold, for ages 14 and up (Tags: Transgender, Coming of Age, Coming Out, Bullying)

• I Was Born for This, for ages 14 and up (Tags: Transgender, Mental Health, Romance)

• The Honeys, for ages 14 and up (Tags: Gender Fluid, Thriller, Horror, Paranormal)

• The Feeling of Falling in Love, for ages 14 years and up (Tags: Transgender, Romance, Homophobia)

The Twelve Stones Podcast: Ep. 4, Mary Hernandez de Carl

The monthly meeting of the Christian County Library Board of Trustees is Tuesday, Oct. 22, at 6 p.m., in the Nixa library. In the mean time, listen to a former teacher and current home educator describe how she got involved and why. October library agenda HERE.

It's not just "White Nationalist Christians" who want to keep kids safe

 

A Straight Christian and a Gay Jew Walk into a Library by David Rice

The Article title sounds like the setup for a joke, but instead, it's a serious discussion about a topic everyone should discuss. Can we work together against Sexually Explicit Material in Missouri?

Read on Substack

Why Kids Aren't Learning

 The next time your local school district makes YET MORE EXCUSES for poor student scores--some are truly scandalous in Christian County--ask them to ponder this:

Link HERE.

The “Right” to Read

 

By Gretchen Garrity

One of the arguments the American Library Association (ALA) and its proponents use to push vulgar, sexually explicit and age-inappropriate books and materials in public libraries is their concocted “Right to Read.” It’s a twisted interpretation of the First Amendment, which allows the ALA to suggest that minor children have a First Amendment right to read anything, regardless of content.

The first thing to note is that this interpretation strips parents’ rights away. Parents have not only the duty, but the right to protect their minor children from books that seek to politically indoctrinate or sexualize them in ways that are contrary to their values and are harmful to the normal development of children. There are many studies that show the harm sexually explicit materials can have on young minds. It’s common sense to protect children emotionally as well as physically, and most parents and citizens have a natural understanding of this concept.

Minor children also have limited rights, and are properly governed by their parents until they reach the age of majority. Most parents believe that children should not be exposed to books and materials that sexualize and/or indoctrinate them in far left agendas.

Freedom of Speech is not Freedom to Read, which is why the ALA is working furiously to codify the Freedom to Read in law. Here is the gist of what the ALA believes about the “freedom” to read. There is enough poop in the statement to make it wholly unacceptable.

The Library Bill of Rights

The American Library Association affirms that all libraries are forums for information and ideas, and that the following basic policies should guide their services. [Note: they use the word ‘policies’ because none of the following is law]

I. Books and other library resources should be provided for the interest, information, and enlightenment of all people of the community the library serves. Materials should not be excluded because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation.

II. Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues. Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.

III. Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.

IV. Libraries should cooperate with all persons and groups concerned with resisting abridgment of free expression and free access to ideas.

V. A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views. [Bolding added]

VI. Libraries which make exhibit spaces and meeting rooms available to the public they serve should make such facilities available on an equitable basis, regardless of the beliefs or affiliations of individuals or groups requesting their use.

VII. All people, regardless of origin, age, background, or views, possess a right to privacy and confidentiality in their library use. [Bolding added] Libraries should advocate for, educate about, and protect people’s privacy, safeguarding all library use data, including personally identifiable information.

Adopted June 19, 1939, by the ALA Council; amended October 14, 1944; June 18, 1948; February 2, 1961; June 27, 1967; January 23, 1980; January 29, 2019.

Inclusion of “age” reaffirmed January 23, 1996. [Bolding added]

USURPATION

Note the ALA is mimicing language from our Constitution. “Library Bill of Rights” is stolen from the Constitution’s Bill of Rights. This is the purposeful usurpation of language and the twisting of it to mean something else. Here is the First Amendment:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Where in the First Amendment does it say that children or even adults have the right to read? If that was so, then every parent whose child graduates from a public high school as a functional illiterate should be able to sue the government schools. The ALA is making up “rights” out of whole cloth in order to carry out a far left agenda.

One of the goals and objectives of the agenda is to control the hearts and minds of your children; hence the ALA’s desperate bid to codify a right to read without regard to age. Every three-year-old to which they can normalize transgender ideology, every ten-year-old that can be sexualized, every fourteen-year-old radicalized to support their agenda is another soldier in their war against our culture.

The ALA’s June 2024 annual meeting resulted in a statement that once again “strongly reaffirms freedom for all to read freely.” It claims our republic is a democracy. It condemns efforts to identify and/or relocate books and decries “efforts to prevent minors from accessing developmentally relevant library materials.”

That seems to be code for books with sexual themes and far left agendas.

The highfalutin’ and elitist language is embarrassing at this point. We all know what they’re up to.

School board member reveals @NJEA uses Marxist fist as its symbol for “RISE; Radical Imagination Summit for Education.”

This is teachers “radical” training for kids from a teachers union. This is Marxism right in our faces.#parenting #moms #dads #edchat @BillSpadea @wakeupnj https://t.co/3wNTURsSoo pic.twitter.com/AagVykIb8G

— Dan Kleinman of SafeLibraries® (@SexHarassed) July 1, 2024

Open Primaries and the Cost to Our Republican Party

 (Cross-posted from Hick Christian's Substack)

The Hidden Impacts of Open Primaries: A Missouri Case Study

By David Rice

Missouri's open primary system presents a complex web of political implications that extend far beyond simple voter accessibility. Recent evidence from Missouri's 1st Legislative District race between Jeff Farnan and Michelle Horner illuminates concerning patterns that raise questions about the actual beneficiaries of open primaries.

The Fundamental Problems of Open Primaries

District 1 is a Case Study

The core vulnerability of open primaries lies in their susceptibility to strategic voting manipulation. With no party registration requirements, voters can freely participate in any party's primary, potentially diluting the voice of committed party members. In Missouri's 6th Congressional District, unusually high primary turnout patterns suggest organized voting behavior that violates traditional party lines.

County Registered Voters /Votes Cast /Vote Percentage

Atchison: 3,783         1,326                  35.1%

Gentry: 4,670             1,808                  38.7%

Holt: 3,207                 962                     30.0%

Nodaway: 13,252        4,014                 30.3%

This phenomenon becomes particularly visible in rural districts, where relatively small voter populations make strategic voting more impactful. The Farnan-Horner race provides a compelling example, with turnout numbers significantly higher than typical primary participation rates.

 

Farnan vs. Horner County Results:

Atchison: 1,012 vs 314

Gentry: 1,327 vs 471

Holt: 713 vs 249

Nodaway: 3,234 vs 790

The Dual Beneficiaries

Strategic Advantage for Opposition Voters

Democrats in predominantly Republican districts can effectively influence Republican primary outcomes by voting for candidates they perceive as more moderate or amenable to their interests. This creates a scenario where the eventual Republican nominee may not truly represent core Republican voter interests.

[FIGURE 4: Insert flowchart showing how cross-party voting influences primary outcomes]

Power Brokers and Financial Interests

Perhaps more concerning is how open primaries benefit political power brokers like Steven Tilley, Rex Sinquefield, Axiom Strategies, or Americans for Prosperity. The system allows influential lobbyists and financiers to exert control through multiple channels.

Just one man, like Steven Tilley, influences every organization. Add the effects of the other financiers, and you create an exponential impact on our political system. 

They touch everything:

- Lobbying relationships with every powerful politician

- PAC connections

- Legislative influence

- Ethics Commission relationships

The Pressing Questions

Given these findings, several critical questions emerge:

1. Why does Missouri maintain an open primary system despite clear evidence of potential manipulation?

2. How do these dynamics affect true representative democracy in rural districts?

3. Who truly benefits from maintaining the current system?

4. What role do financial interests play in preserving open primaries?

5. Why is Jeff Farnan able to co-sponsor an anti-gun bill (HB 32) with a Democrat, and the party scrubs it from his House Website? 

Think about how powerful Farnan’s protectors are in this regard. Think about how important it is for them to continue to have Farnan elected. 

Think how Orwellian this is. Think how despicable this thought control—from the Super Majority Republican Party.

Yet, he’s only one person. They are more than willing to do this for every Knock-Off Chinese Republican that will vote with Kehoe. Your Republican party isn’t Republican, nor is it Conservative or Constitutional. 

Conclusion

The evidence suggests that Missouri's open primary system may function less as a tool for voter empowerment and more as a mechanism for external influence in local politics. 

The unusual voting patterns in District 1 and the complex political relationships revealed through the Tilley/Sinquefield investigation web of finances indicate a state-wide system that undermines rather than enhances Representative Representation.

Democrats openly vote in your primaries. They openly influence your selections of candidates. And they openly finance your candidates through lobbyists and financiers. When you go vote on November 5th, you aren’t voting for Republicans. You’re voting for people with an R next to their name.

I know you are going to the poll on November 5th to vote for Kehoe over Quade, thinking you are saving the State. The thing is, you’ve already lost.

The state was rigged against you in the Primary. They chose your Democrat candidate for you when you were trying to swear up and down Ashcr@ft was a “good Christian man.” 

Why doesn’t Jess Piper run in District 1? Because it would be running against another Democrat. 

Why don’t they put up a better Democrat against Kehoe than Quade? Because they know it would be a waste of a good Democrat.

They hate us...

 

Library replaces Columbus Day with Staff Training Day.

I’m surprised they didn’t call it Indigenous Librarians Day.

They hate us and they’re using public funding to do it.#parenting #moms #dads #tlchat https://t.co/S1DCz9HcvS

— Dan Kleinman of SafeLibraries® (@SexHarassed) October 15, 2024

It's Columbus Day!

 

The Christian County Library is closed because it's a "Staff Training Day." Don't the employees get the federal holiday off? A keyword search of "Christopher Columbus" in the Coolcat Catalog is interesting. Here is a decent book for kids: Columbus Day. Another one HERE. It describes Columbus as "neither as hero nor heel but as a flawed and complex man whose significance is undeniably monumental." Here's a lovely entry: Kill Columbus, in which time travelers seek to go back in time and kill the explorer before he can discover the new world. Sigh. Slim pickings for children.

According to National Days Blog: "Columbus Day, observed on the second Monday of October, is a federal holiday in the United States commemorating Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the Americas on October 1292. In 2024, Columbus Day falls on October 14th. It is a reminder of the spirit of exploration, the quest for new horizons, and the courage to venture into the unknown. This day not only honours Columbus’s achievements but also invites us to reflect on the historical implications of his voyages."

 

 

Public #libraries nationwide are wiping out Columbus Day. Here’s something that can be done to wrest control from the @ALALibrary #librarians using public money to attack America. 🇺🇸

School board restores #ColumbusDay!#parenting #moms #dads #tlchat #IndigenousPeoplesDay https://t.co/WIJQXAfiV2

— Dan Kleinman of SafeLibraries® (@SexHarassed) October 14, 2024

 

This is how the Christian County Library cancels the federal holiday of Columbus Day. The new holiday is "Staff Training Day." From the handbook:

 

Horrible

 

If you send your child to a US high school today, he has a 1-in-30 chance of identifying as "trans" and a 1-in-18 chance of questioning his gender, making him 4-10x more likely to attempt suicide. Seek alternatives as though your kid's life depends on it.https://t.co/kputZBaRk1

— Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) October 13, 2024