By David Rice
According to the Missouri Independent, Mike Kehoe stated during the campaign,
“Since I’ve been in state government, we’ve cut the income tax from 6%
to 4.7%,” Kehoe said. “I have backed $2.4 billion in tax cuts since I’ve
been in office. But now, we need to take that to zero. That’s a key to
our economic development strategy.”
He’s working closely with two organizations, Americans for Prosperity and the American Legislative Exchange Council, to help push bills through this session to accomplish his campaign promise.
@RareCamellia [Camellia
Peterson] is an AFP Lobbyist, self-declared Libertarian [Big-Government
Libertarian], and School Choice [Tax-Funded Private and Homeschools]
proponent. Experience has shown that it is always worth investigating
how her benefactors manipulate the tax code if she is behind something.
Missouri's
2025 legislative session has revealed two competing visions for tax
reform, each with dramatically different impacts on how Missourians will
pay taxes. One plan aims to directly reduce taxes, while another
reorganizes how taxes are collected while maintaining state revenue.
The
bill Kehoe supports doesn’t reduce spending, though I am sure they will
claim their pretensions of tax cuts. Under Kehoe’s tenure as Lt.
Governor, spending in Missouri doubled from ~$27B to ~$52B. This year,
his budget is $54B. Kehoe stated they cut $2.4B in tax cuts, yet they
spent so much money that it is hard to see where the tax cuts occurred.
Bill SponsorsSenator Mike Moon, widely recognized as the Senate's most conservative member, has introduced Senate Bill 1029. His proposal would phase out corporate income tax entirely by 2029, reducing it by 0.8% each year until it reaches zero.
On the other hand, Representative Bishop Davidson, not known for conservative values, introduced House Bill 100 and House Joint Resolution 1.
These bills are backed by Americans for Prosperity (AFP), a
pseudo-conservative advocacy group, and the American Legislative
Exchange Council (ALEC), an organization that develops model legislation
for state lawmakers.
Bills are often written by front groups
like ALEC, who then convince Reps like Davidson to present them in
exchange for support during their runs for office. Reps like Davidson
rarely read the bills but are convinced easily because they want the
office and the prestige that comes with the office.
Several
senators, including Curtis Trent, Ben Brown, Nick Schroer, and Jill
Carter, have filed identical bills to increase the chances of passage.
These senators have shown more interest in serving their own re-election
than their constituents.
Two Different Approaches
Moon's approach is straightforward:
remove corporate taxes that businesses currently pass on to consumers
through higher prices. Companies paying less in taxes can reduce prices
on everyday items like groceries, shoes, and gas. His bill states,
"Beginning with the 2029 tax year, there shall be no income tax on
corporate income."
The AFP/ALEC plan is far more complex—this
complexity is purposeful. They don’t want you to be able to read it or
understand it. They disguise it using legal code. While marketed as an
income tax reduction, it introduces a European-style consumption tax
system known as the Value Added Tax (VAT). Here's how it works:
First,
they expand what can be taxed. The plan removes Missouri's current ban
on taxing services (adding a new tax) and sets a sales tax rate of
"three and seven hundred seventy-five thousandths percent" on goods and
services. This means you'll pay taxes on products and services like car
repairs, haircuts, and professional fees.
This is taking more
money out of your pocket that you can’t afford and giving it not to the
business owner but to the government. Taxes—corporate taxes—always go to
the government. They don’t go to the business. The people who pay for
them are the end consumers—you and me. Mike Moon understands this.
AFP/ALEC also assumes you’re stupid and will be easily fooled.
Second,
they create a "Tax Reform Fund." The bill states, "if the amount of net
general revenue collected exceeds the anticipated general fund revenue
expenditures for a fiscal year by one million dollars or more," that
extra money goes into this fund.
Finally, they promise income tax
relief, but with conditions. The law says income tax rates can only be
reduced "if the tax reform fund reaches and maintains a minimum balance
that is greater than or equal to one hundred twenty million dollars." In
other words, you'll only see income tax relief if the state collects
enough extra money from the new service taxes.
Here is Mike Moon’s Plan:
People won’t give the government any more money when they buy goods through corporate taxes.
The end.
Here is the AFP/ALEC Plan
People will now have a new tax through haircuts, car repairs, and professional services.
People will pay more for groceries, gas, and goods.
If
people have paid enough money through the VAT tax system and been good
boys and girls, and only if the government gets $120M in reserves will
they get an income tax break.
There are no guarantees that there will be a reduction to 0%. It’s only proposed.
The
government does not have to reduce its spending but is encouraged to
spend more under this model. Under Mike Moon’s model, the government has
to reduce its spending because it generates less revenue from the
taxpayer.
Understanding the European Model
The AFP/ALEC plan mirrors
the Value Added Tax (VAT) system used in Europe. Under a VAT system,
taxes are built into the price of goods and services at every step of
production and sale. While your paycheck might look bigger because of
reduced income tax, you'll pay more every time you purchase anything
from a good to a service.
So, the corporations still have to pay
their taxes to Missouri every step of the way under the AFP/ALEC plan,
which gets pushed to you. Then, they will add new taxes, which get
driven to you again. The corporation doesn’t pay taxes on anything. The
consumer pays taxes on everything. Taxes for a business are a cost built
into the price of every tube of toothpaste, every roll of toilet paper,
and every bag of Tostidos.
The AFP/ALEC plan doesn’t assist you
or save you money unless you can somehow drop out of the economy and
live as a homesteader. Yet, this won’t work because they will rely on
income tax if you do. You would have to quit working and buying not to
pay any taxes into their system. A few of us are hardy enough to do
that, but most of us do not have the resources to live as a homeless
person.
Think of it this way: Moon's system recognizes that
government taxes on businesses make your groceries, shoes, and gas more
expensive. He wants to make those items cheaper by removing those taxes.
The AFP/ALEC system says they'll give you more money in your paycheck,
but only after you've paid higher prices on everything you buy and if
the state collects enough revenue from those higher prices.
Impact on Missourians
The
difference between these approaches is significant. Under Moon's plan,
corporate tax reduction would directly lower business costs, potentially
reducing consumer prices.
Under the AFP/ALEC plan, while your
paycheck might eventually show less tax withholding, you'll pay new
taxes on services and likely higher prices on goods to make up for it
without forcing the government to be lean or to force the government to
reduce its budget. If the government never reduces its budget, it may
have enacted a VAT and an income tax system, which we’ll never get rid
of.
Governor-elect Mike Kehoe has promised to eliminate Missouri's
state income tax—but you can be sure he will plan to increase your tax
burden. The state receives 65% of its revenue ($13.35 billion) from
income taxes. [Consider how much of our revenue comes from other sources
and how much we overspend right now.]
In 2024, Missouri’s income tax declined for the first time. Our
population is flat and not growing. Our children are not being born. Our
people are retiring and aging out of the job market.Do you
understand why they want a VAT? Because they can tax retirees using a
VAT when they can’t tax their retirement accounts. This is about an
aging population that must be taxed to maintain enormous expenditures.
With more young people postponing families, birthrates plummeting, and
family formation not occurring until a later age, AFP/ALEC is also
calculating they can take more of the expendable income from these young
individuals rather than encourage them to have families and have
children. They are managing our decline rather than trying to head it
off. They have decided the culture war is lost (a strange thing for
supposedly conservative groups to give up on), and they are helping RINO
legislators capitalize on it to spend more money like Democrats.
The AFP/ALEC plan ensures this revenue continues through expanded
sales taxes, while Moon's plan seeks an actual reduction in total tax
collection.
For Missouri taxpayers, the choice is between a
genuine tax reduction that could lower prices and our budget versus a
restructuring that maintains state revenue while making taxes less
visible. While the AFP/ALEC plan's promise of zero income tax sounds
appealing, the reality is that Missourians could end up paying the same
amount or more in total taxes, just in a different way.
The battle
over these competing visions will likely define Missouri's 2025
legislative session. Kehoe’s plan, backed by the AFP/ALEC, aims to
continue spending at unsustainable levels through a regressive tax
structure to take money from families who can’t afford to spare it.
Mike
Moon plans to reduce the costs for every family across the state by
removing the government’s invisible hand from business costs that we
don’t see in gas, groceries, and goods. Mike Moon’s plan doesn’t add a
new tax to our services or lock us into a new tax in our code that we
may never remove again.
Conclusion
The contrast between
these approaches reveals more than competing tax policies—it exposes
fundamentally different visions for Missouri's future.
The
AFP/ALEC plan represents sophisticated bureaucratic management that
accepts demographic decline as inevitable. It aims to maintain high
government spending through complex tax mechanisms by shifting tax
burdens to young professionals and retirees while making taxation less
visible but more pervasive. It's a nuanced strategy for managing
Missouri's diminishing population and changing demographics without
addressing the root causes of decline.
Moon's approach, by
contrast, represents a vision of economic liberty. By removing corporate
taxes that inflate the cost of everyday goods, his plan returns money
directly to people's pockets. This gives families more resources for
formation and growth while forcing the government to operate within
reduced means. Rather than managing decline through bureaucratic
complexity, it trusts Missourians with their own economic choices.
The
fundamental difference isn't just about tax rates or revenue
collection. It's about whether Missouri will accept and manage its
decline through sophisticated tax schemes or potentially empower its
citizens through economic freedom to reverse these trends.
Moon's
straightforward plan offers a genuine reduction in tax burden and
government scope, while the AFP/ALEC proposal ensures continued high
spending through an intricate web of consumption taxes.
For Missouri's future, the choice is between managing decay and enabling renewal.
Follow me on X @HickChristNews
HickChristian
is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our
work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
