 |
Can be found HERE in the CCL
|
By Gretchen Garrity
Well-meaning local liberals often frame the issue of gender ideology, sexually explicit and age-inappropriate books in the library as a free speech issue. This could not be further from the truth.
Ideologues in places far removed from Christian County, have been using that argument to deflect from the very dark agenda that is at the bottom of providing such materials to children. Not only is this agenda spread throughout our nation in schools, libraries, and other government institutions, but it has permeated the corporate world through policies that promote special transgender rights and the forced use of preferred pronouns when addressing transgender and/or queer individuals.
 |
Found HERE in the CCL
|
Controlling the use of language through forced speech is the tip of the spear for bringing radical change to our understanding of social and political issues. If children can be trained (through Social Emotional Learning) to give up their right to free speech through a misplaced sense of compassion and inclusion, then they can be trained to give up other rights and to deprive others of their rights. Jennifer Bilek, a journalist who has written extensively on gender ideology for over a decade, gives us a glimpse into the abyss. And it is truly an abyss.
In her article, "Gender Rights Are AI Rights," Bilek explains why children are a focal point:
"The LGBTQI+ political infrastructure of today is being used to drive body dissociation toward human symbiosis with AI, which Silicon Valley has been promising us since the early 2000s.
Children are being groomed for industrial body dissociation, to think of their wholly sexed anatomy as commodities...The children are essential to get on board for changing our perceptions of ourselves as a binary-sexed species so that technology can overtake the reproductive capacities of humanity toward this union.
All the harms manifesting out of gender ideology are downstream of the concept being forced on society, through tyrannically compelled language that there is another type of being that is beyond male and female. Contrary to popular thought, this is not about anyone having body dysphoria, or a special identity, or protections for people who are same-sex attracted. It is a virtual reality being constructed out of institutionalized language that deconstructs what it means to be a human, as we now think of ourselves.
This is the entire point of gender ideology; to deconstruct the way humanity thinks of itself. Children are ground zero for this indoctrination. Gender ideology - the ideology promoting industrial body dissociation - has been institutionalized in children’s health curriculums in schools, their libraries, TV programming, social media, and presents wherever children are in the culture. Changing children’s perceptions of themselves as whole, biologically sexed systems, is what gender ideology does."
Further, she states, "Understanding that the reconfiguration of ourselves as a sexually dimorphic species - and especially the perceptions of children - for a technological usurpation of human reproduction is underway, is difficult. This process of gr--ming has been attached to the human rights political apparatus for people who are same-sex attracted. All the messages and propaganda tell us that these changes are for a marginalized sexual identity, when in fact this ideology deconstructs the sex binary, upon which same-sex attraction exists."
Please read Bilek's article in its entirety. It lays out the case that the gender ideology agenda is so much more than the farcical "right to read" the American Library Association pushes in its relentless indoctrination of librarians.
 |
| Found HERE in the CCL |
|
The deconstruction of our sexed reality (male and female) is the stuff of dystopian films, but nevertheless it is a reality that we must grapple with and defeat on every level of society. In Christian County it means coming to terms with the stubborn insistence of providing children and teens unrestricted access to books they are not prepared to emotionally and intellectually process, and to take from parents the right to decide what their child can and cannot read.
Local activists often say that any effort to accommodate parent rights is an abrogation of the rights of other parents who may want their children to have access to books that are sexually explicit, promote transgender ideology, etc. Indeed, even labeling books is considered censorship and a soft form of banning books, we are told.
 |
Found HERE in the CCL
|
This is an inconsistent and flawed argument. Claiming books that are often featured in library displays during "Banned Books Week" as "banned" or "censored," is self-evidently untrue! Often during Pride Month books are happily labeled with LGBTQ stickers in bright rainbow displays. So how can it be considered stigmatizing or a form of censorship if those same books are labeled as such on the shelves? How is it "banning" a book to have it located where it is accessible to any parent who cares to check it out for his or her child?
Activists have swallowed whole the idea that any common sense solutions are an abrogation of the rights of a child of any age to access these materials. Why are they so insistent? Why do librarians lace these books throughout the children and teen sections of the library in a seeming random way, so that parents would, of necessity, have to hover over every single book their child pulls off the shelf?
 |
Found HERE in the CCL
|
Either activists--inside or outside the library--are ignorant of the deeper implications of providing children with age-inappropriate materials, or they know and are using the library to further political and social goals that are wildly out of alignment with Christian County community values.
The gender ideology books featured in this article are a few among many that are directed toward children--some as young as age three--in our library branches.
Bilek ends her article with this admonition:
"With a body-denying ideology tied to a civil rights structure for same-sex attracted individuals, to drive a technological dystopia, we are all in deep seas and treading water. But if we can let go of our illusions that this is somehow a benevolent movement for the marginalized and arm ourselves with information about how this tyrannical force is operating, we can devise creative ways to resist it. There is no choice; we must."
We really have no choice. We have to resist.
