Committing Abortion

 

From: Abe Books

 By Gretchen Garrity

"You adulterous people! Don’t you know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God? So whoever wants to be the friend of the world becomes the enemy of God."  James 4:4

My friend and fellow writer David Rice wrote a scathing and brutal satire regarding certain political figures' support for Amendment 3: "Prohibit Abortion and Gender Transition Procedures for Minors Amendment" that is on the Missouri ballot for November of this year.

The satire described in visceral detail the spiritual crime of supporting an amendment that pays lip service to pro-life policies, but in reality changes almost nothing of the current state of affairs in Missouri regarding abortion. 

While a previous Amendment 3 enshrined the right to abortion in the Missouri constitution, this new Amendment 3 supposedly adds a few restrictions. The "pro-life" movement gladly accepts another round of incrementalism hoping to curtail the murder of pre-born babies at some point in the distant future.

Among other provisions, Amendment 3 states, "...prohibit abortions except in cases of "medical emergency, fetal anomaly, rape, or incest," and permit abortions in cases of rape or incest only through 12 weeks of gestation..."

Do any pro-life proponents believe that there are not doctors willing to provide an abortion on the merest pretext? Who decides what a medical emergency is? Most surgical abortions are procured within the 12-week time frame. Additionally, the majority of abortions now are chemically induced by pills, which are not covered in this amendment.

The bottom line is that abortion will continue unabated in Missouri--without missing a heartbeat. Almost nothing is gained. In exchange for a Yes vote on Amendment 3, supporters will gain a bit on the transgender front (which is already on its way out) and which has nothing at all to do with abortion.

This is how the sausage is made. Corrupt lobbyists and legislators dangle a shiny thing in front of you in order to distract you. A little poop in the brownie won't matter because you won't be able to taste it, right?

Sen. Adam Schnelting

 In essence, we are back to square one on the abortion issue. Proponents on each side of the issue continue on as before, while babies are being murdered and women are being traumatized. The political rhetoric to score points continues on. The fundraising on both sides continues on. The lies on both sides continue on. The status quo remains.

Declaring pre-born babies as persons is a third way of making abortion untenable. See linked personhood bills below.

By affirming the personhood of pre-born babies, it necessarily categorizes abortion as a crime. Committing abortion is committing a crime. This is the crux of the matter. It matters not if a child has been conceived in rape or incest. It matters not if a child is unwanted. The circumstances of a child's conception does not negate the personhood of that child.

There have been several personhood bills introduced in the Missouri Legislature in the last several years. The Republican Majority has been unwilling to seriously consider these bills. Why? Here are several current bills:

SB951

HB 1682

HB2688

HJR109 

HB3056

HB1661

No one of substantive thinking and reasoning can credibly deny that our culture is in a death spiral. Abortion, sex trafficking, drugs, transgender ideology, Critical Race Theory (which has jump started white guilt and self-hatred) as well as the breakdown of the nuclear family have been largely triumphant over a weakened Christian culture.

Aside from the Catholic Church, which was valiant in the early years of the pro-life movement but has waned, it is Protestant laypeople who are now propping up the pro-life movement. Pastors are lethargic and cowardly. Sheep without a shepherd are easily scattered.  

Sen. Rick Brattin

It is largely the pro-life movement that is currently splintering the Republican Party. Weak and accommodating legislation like the current Amendment 3 is indicative of a compromising GOP "super majority." It is plain to all but a few diehard partisan Republicans that both parties are controlled--and played--by moneyed interests who willfully direct legislation.

Abortion, the selling of baby parts, and medical experimentation is big money. Women are often devastated by aborting their children and may end up with further medical issues, as well as the emotional devastation of the decision to kill their child. The sorcery of Big Pharma (the word comes from pharmakeia (φαρμακεία) which is partly defined as magic spells) benefits many ways from abortion.

Back to David's satire, which you can read HERE. He spares no one. Sen. Adam Schnelting, his Chief of Staff Sherry Kuttenkuler Arthaud, Sen. Rick Brattin, Scott Faughn, and Pastor Tom Estes who is Sen. Brattin's Chief of Staff are all rhetorically skewered by Rice for their support of Amendment 3.

Pastor Tom Estes

Essentially, Rice's satire details the spiritual crime of supporting a constitutional amendment that approves of the murder of pre-born children in certain cases. The moral slicing and dicing it takes to legislatively destroy the Sixth Commandment is indicative of how far Christians and Republicans have fallen.

Realize that Republicans could have passed a personhood bill at any time in the last several years. THEY CHOSE NOT TO. Instead, they are compromising with grave evil. This moral chasm is as great as that of Lazarus and the Rich Man, and it is precisely this that has caused the divide in the Republican Party in Missouri.

Some interesting fallout of David's satire occurred yesterday. A particular champion of conservative values, Lisa Pannett, took great offense at his article. Pannett is one half of the Shield Maidens, who are savvy political pundits (Pannett is a lobbyist) navigating the corruption in Jefferson City.

The graphic physical description of the spiritual sins being committed by politicians who support Amendment 3, was too much for her sensibilities. She took to Facebook to complain. A few others, including former state senator Bill Eigel (who frankly sounded like a prudish school marm) also sounded off at Rice's satire. There was outrage, there was disgust, there was a reactionary gathering of offended individuals, and it wasn't long before talk of a lawsuit was bandied about.  

Scott Faughn

Hmmm...what happened to free speech rights? Apparently the time-honored American sport of satirizing public figures was a bridge too far for some on the "Right." The depiction of aborted babies being made into political sausage by compromising Republicans was too much.

The real thing, the physical murder of certain babies that Schnelting and Brattin and Estes and Kuttenkuler Arthaud are willing to compromise with by supporting Amendment 3 apparently pales in comparison to Rice's satire.

Sherry Kuttenkuler Arthaud

No, in the estimation of the self-righteous, Rice's sin is greater, and he must be shut down. Money must be raised to hire lawyers to conduct lawfare. Rice, who has done great work on behalf of Republican causes in Missouri, must be buried.

This is the state of reasoning in Republican circles. I cast about for a reason why the satire triggered a few others. Most of them are quite active in political circles. Perhaps they were concerned they may someday come under scrutiny from Rice's pen. Perhaps they felt compassion for the objects of David's scorn. Perhaps they see an avenue to get rid of this troublesome fellow.

Perhaps some have been traumatized by abortion themselves, whether through procuring one or knowing someone who has. If so, that speaks directly to the emotional damage that abortion inflicts on women as well as their babies.

 

Prediction: accurate
"Just think, my dear ladies, of how many mentally disturbed women we are going have in the United States in the next 10 or 15 years when the guilt of abortion begins to attack the mind and soul."pic.twitter.com/MKYphIXia3

— The Chivalry Guild (@ChivalryGuild) January 11, 2026

Whatever went on in the minds of those who improperly, unchristianly I might add, decided to publicly attack Rice, it is a very bad look. Pannett had already voiced her objections to Rice in a private chat. He ably defended his satire to her.

Taking it public was a mistake. You won't stop him or others like him from writing stinging critiques of public figures. In fact, you have called into question your own bonafides as darlings of all things conservative.

Jefferson City is a stronghold of spiritual evil. Very few survive it unscathed, uncompromised. Weak-minded Republicans (the majority) are mostly useless. You don't win by playing by the rules of evil systems. You break the system. If you are in Jefferson City thinking you are going to win by playing within the system, you have already lost.

If you doubt that the system can be destroyed, you are an unworthy Republican, let alone Christian. The system, of itself, will eventually fall. All such compromised systems fail in the end, whether you personally do anything about it or not. They flourish like a green bay tree and then are gone. They fall like the Tower of Babel. Failing to accept their Messiah, the Jews saw their temple destroyed within a generation, not one stone left upon another.

The personal, spiritual question for Republicans, conservatives, pro-life advocates is this: What are you doing in Jefferson City if you aren't pulling down strongholds? Where is your moral clarity? If you are more offended by a writer's depiction of spiritual sin than by the abomination of actual abortion, then you should sit down.

And if you find yourself suggesting a lawsuit to shut down free speech, you have become what you purport to hate. I have observed the spirit of compromise that permeates Jefferson City's Republican Party. To compromise with sin is to make yourself an enemy of God.

Committing abortion is committing a sin. It should be illegal as it is the murder of a person. The stuffy Republicans who cannot abide descriptions of visceral spiritual sin but who would advocate for supporters of Amendment 3 over free speech should spend some time in self-reflection. They should withdraw their threats of a lawsuit, not least because they will lose. If they persist, they show themselves to be the comrades of the lawfare crowd.

Above all, they should seek moral clarity. I suggest they open their Bibles at Genesis and commence reading through to Revelation.

Missouri Liberty Radio

  

David Rice and myself were guests during Sam Britton's Off the Cuff radio show at Missouri Liberty Radio. The subject was libraries. We were on during the second and third hours--beginning around the 56-minute mark:

January 18, 2026 Off the Cuff

Make Libraries Beautiful Again

 

Sometimes, we all need an escape.

Wiblingen Monastery Library in Ulm. pic.twitter.com/ox9Jdwh9N7

— Fascinating History (@Fascinate_Hist) January 4, 2026

Make Home Libraries Great Again

 

Dr. Scott Hahn’s home library is so massive that he uses the Library of Congress classification system to organize and keep track of his books. pic.twitter.com/ArexQQLBxv

— Aery Faery ~* (@aery_faery) August 30, 2025

Bringing back the private library

 As our dystopian culture moves more and more to streaming options, ebooks and digital information, physical community libraries will lessen their collections to accommodate technology. It's time to bring back private libraries.

She's building a literal library in her home 😳 pic.twitter.com/VgQyOitGim

— Financial Dystopia (@financedystop) December 28, 2025

The State of Journalism Today

 By Gretchen Garrity

Yesterday, David Rice and myself spent some time with Tom Martz of the Locke and Smith Foundation, a non-partisan constitutional organization that keeps track of our Missouri legislature.

Martz, a local talk radio host on KSGF 104.1 who was filling in for Nick Reed, was interested in local independent journalism. You can listen to the show HERE. It's in two parts, with the first part (dated 12/26/25) beginning about 20 minutes in.

As an illustration of how bankrupt and useless corporate media is, watch how a young man busted wide open the fraud in Minnesota. As Martenson says, "This can only mean they [media] are complicit in covering up fraud as long as it's being done by 'their team." 

Exactly correct. My hope is that young journalists will push back on the indoctrination they are inevitably confronted with in journalism school. Expose it! It would make a great story and it might just help to reform the fetid mess in journalism. Seek truth and not a journalistic tribal narrative. There are lots of great independent journalists out there like Glenn Greenwald and Max Blumenthal.

It's quite telling that a 23-year-old in a hoodie did what every major news organization in the US could not manage to do: Real investigative journalism. This can only mean they are complicit in covering up fraud as long as it's being done by 'their team.' https://t.co/uhGURDda1C

— Chris Martenson (@chrismartenson) December 27, 2025

Cross Post: A Prayer to St. Dudash-Buskirk, Patron Saint of Rhetoric and BDSM (Satire)

An Intercessory Appeal to the Only One With Power to Actually Help In the name of the ALA, and of EveryLibrary, and of the Holy Institutional Backing, Amen.

By David Rice

Click on image for clarity

 St. Dudash-Buskirk, PhD in Rhetoric, Professor at Missouri State University, backed by the American Library Association and EveryLibrary, hear my prayer.

I come before you as a supplicant, a lone citizen without credentials, without institutional backing, without the organizational power that you wield so effortlessly. I have already prayed to St. Michael the Archangel at a library board meeting (at the 4:00 minute mark) and you found that offensive. But I understand now my mistake.

 St. Michael cannot help me with earthly institutions. He has no PhD. He holds no university position. He commands no professional networks. He cannot call the Attorney General or write academic papers or leverage organizational backing. He only fights as the commander of God’s angelic armies, so it’s not real power.

But you have real power and you can help me.

So I pray to you instead, O Patron Saint of Rhetoric and Institutional Power, that you might intercede on behalf of the marginalized—a role you claim as your sacred calling.

First Petition: For Sight to See Who is Marginalized

St. Dudash-Buskirk, grant me understanding of your Critical Theory of Power.

You teach that we must identify who holds power and who is powerless. You proclaim the importance of protecting marginalized voices against institutional authority. You celebrate speaking truth to power and challenging entrenched systems.

So I ask: Why do you not intercede on my behalf?

What you claim to value:

• Speaking truth to power

• Challenging entrenched institutions

• Protecting marginalized voices

• Exposing institutional corruption

• Resisting institutional authority

What I actually do:

• Expose institutional corruption (staff illegally suing the board)

• Challenge entrenched power (administration covering up violations)

• Speak truth to power (one citizen vs. PhDs, ALA, MSU, EveryLibrary)

• Protect citizens from institutional overreach (BDSM instructions for teenagers)

• Resist institutional authority (refuse to be “handled” by administrators)

Your institutional backing:

• PhD in Rhetoric from a major university

• Teaching position at Missouri State University

• American Library Association

• EveryLibrary (national lobbying organization)

• Professional credentials and networks

• Executive Director Will Blydenburgh (your ally)

• Media sympathy

• Friends who rally around you

• Career advancement opportunities

My backing:

• A library book

• A prayer you found offensive

• No credentials

• No organization

• No church support (they reject this fight)

• No professional network

• Lost friends

• Increasing isolation

Under your own framework, I am the marginalized voice. You are the institutional power.

Yet you defend the institution and attack me.

St. Dudash-Buskirk, intercede that I might understand this mystery.

Second Petition: For the Contradiction of Words

Holy Mother of Relativism, you teach that all truth is constructed, that moral claims are mere power plays.

Yet you called my reading “salacious.”

If the book isn’t salacious on the shelf for teenagers, why is it salacious when I quote it?

The content didn’t change. The speaker changed.

You cannot claim both that books are neutral information AND that my speech is harmful. If words have no meaning, then “salacious” is meaningless, your objection is meaningless, your entire Facebook post is meaningless.

But if words have power—if language shapes reality—then my prayer has power (that’s why you objected), my reading has power (that’s why you called it salacious), and the book’s content has power (that’s why it matters what’s in the library).

You use language to convey meaning while teaching that meaning doesn’t exist.

The word “salacious” has no place in your worldview. But you used it anyway, because you know words carry moral weight. You just don’t want to admit that truth applies to the books you defend.

St. Dudash-Buskirk, intercede that you might recognize the contradiction you embody.

Is it wrong for adults to participate in BDSM or Kink? If so, why? If not, why not?

You won’t answer. You deflect to authorities (ALA, Freedom to Read), make pop culture references, claim I violated decorum.

But here’s the simplest question: Why should strangers instruct children in sexual practices?

This isn’t a parent answering their child’s questions. This is institutional strangers giving sexual values to children as if values don’t exist.

If sex has no value, then rape is not a crime.

Answer the question or admit words mean something.

St. Dudash-Buskirk, intercede that you might answer what you refuse to address.

Third Petition: For Justice in the Matter of the Edited Video

O Defender of Institutional Prerogatives, I bring before you a documented case of public records destruction.

The public meeting video was edited to remove Tory Pegram’s challenge to the board’s oversight authority. This is a Sunshine Law violation—the destruction and alteration of public records to hide inconvenient challenges to institutional power.

Read the rest here.

Jacob Marley's Lesson

Fred Barnard

By Gretchen Garrity

 

  "I wear the chain I forged in life. I made it link by link, and yard by yard; I girded it on of my own free will, and of my own free will I wore it. Is its pattern strange to you?” Jacob Marley's Ghost in A Christmas Carol

MSU Professor Elizabeth Dudash-Buskirk's eternal soul is in trouble. While she claims to be a Christian, she nevertheless promotes salacious (her own term) books for minors in the Christian County Library. One such book was quoted from at the December board of trustees meeting: Sex Plus. Here is a review of the book: Sex Plus is a Youth Book in Nixa by David Rice--but before you visit the review, here is what Dudash-Buskirk said about it in a recent Facebook post:

"First, we had David Rice who first prayed, then read law, then engaged a salacious YA book that described pretty accurately the common teen experience of masturbation, questions about sexual guidelines or what is normal."

Now, try to square that with the book review by Rice. The book contains subheadings like "Strap-ons," "Cleaning Sex Toys," "Prostate Massager," "Butt Plugs and Anal Beads,"Vibrators," "Visiting the Sex Shop," and more than you can imagine.

Now according to the Catholic Church, of which Dudash-Buskirk claims to be a member, masturbation is a sin against the Sixth Commandment. Protestants of different types are on the fence, but in general, masturbation is frowned upon. Viewing pornography is almost a given with masturbation.

Promoting books like Sex Plus (which is written for ages 12-17), is a sin against God and an attack on children. Claiming to be a Christian as a way of virtue signaling while violating its precepts is also a sin.

Professor Dudash-Buskirk also claims to be a free speech advocate. But if it is speech she personally objects to, her thought is that it must be controlled, suppressed, and censored. In her own words (click on the image for clarity):

One can see the confusion, which is a hallmark of the demonic. I wrote about it HERE. Professor Dudash-Buskirk does not want books like Sex Plus exposed to the public. It makes her job of interpreting "free speech" rights look downright satanic (and it is). According to her, quoting salacious books in a public library meeting is unacceptable, as is prayer speech. But one must never question a child's "freedom to read" a salacious book that some book publisher or librarian or the American Library Assocation has deemed acceptable.

Enough.

Beginning around the 3:20 minute mark (it should be prompted), you can listen to Rice's comments and then Professor Dudash-Buskirk. Listen for yourself and decide which individual is seeking to protect children and preserve parental rights.

The chains one forges in life will continue afterwards. Ebenezer Scrooge saw the light before it was too late, unlike his business associate Jacob Marley. My prayer is that those who support exposing children to highly-charged sexualization will see the light before they too are weighed down with the chains of sin un-confessed and un-forsaken.

ΨΥΧΗΣ ΙΑΤΡΕΙΟΝ

 

The Abbey library of St Gall is one of the oldest monastic libraries in the world

Above the entrance door is a Greek inscription, ΨΥΧΗΣ ΙΑΤΡΕΙΟΝ (psukhēs iatreion), which translates to “healing place for the soul.” This wording is inspired by an inscription found at the Library… pic.twitter.com/m5mqxbBhd5

— James Lucas (@JamesLucasIT) December 4, 2025

 

Also: The Most Beautiful Libraries on Earth

The Inner Library

 

When Libraries were based

Marsh's Library
Dublin, Ireland
Built in 1707 pic.twitter.com/feIY3woXlg

— The Ways of A Gentleman (@Gentleman_Ways) November 17, 2025

It's One Cabal

Facebook

 By Gretchen Garrity

Rep. Bob Titus held a fundraiser recently. It was held at Affinity Riverside Estate in Springfield. It was very well attended by supporters, as well as elected officials. Congressman Eric Burlison was slated to attend but had to be back in Washington D.C. for the vote to reopen the federal government. He did appear via phone video, and endorsed Rep. Titus. 

There was, however, a very interesting occurrence at the event. There were protesters present. The paid kind, in my opinion.

Rep. Bob Titus

Perhaps they believed Congressman Burlison was going to be there. Perhaps they were sent specifically to send a message to the other elected officials who attended. Protesters were stationed at both the bottom and top of the entrance to the venue. They were not a large number, perhaps 10, and as you can see from the photo, they were there to intimidate more than to protest.

Some were masked, some had bullhorns, most had signs. At the top of the entrance way, one of the protesters stayed busy filming the vehicles of all who drove up. In the darkness, it was difficult to figure out what they were protesting, although there was a lot of yelling.

On the way out, I rolled down my window and inquired of one of the protesters what they were specifically protesting.

"You are gonna pay, fascist," was the reply.

This is the kind of rhetoric (h/t to Dash) that solves nothing. The fact it was most likely paid protesters intimates the Cabal who runs things in Missouri is getting nervous. They sense a move of something they cannot control. 

It's getting ugly out there. Stand fast.

"Rhetoric" from: Columbus Day is Back, Baby!

 

Defining Terms

Brian Doyle, The Daily Declaration

By Gretchen Garrity

The next time local activists spout off about free speech at the library, share this story with them. From the article,"A Western Australian library worker who refused to undergo mandatory 'diversity' training promoting transgender ideology is now taking legal action, after being forced from his job after 15 years of faithful service.

Declan Mansfield, a former employee of the City of Armadale library in Perth’s southeast, said he was pressured to resign after opting out of a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) course that, he believed, embedded transgender ideology in the workplace.

'There should be no ideological litmus test that employees in either the public or private sectors should have to pass to gain and retain employment,' Declan told The Daily Declaration.

'This should be especially so in libraries, which rely at their ideological core on the notion of freedom of speech.'"

It would be a terrible pity to find out that such things happen to library staff here in the USA. Another reason the ALA is wholly unsuited to be an authoritative voice for libraries. Like all ideologues who oppose traditional values like parents' rights, the ALA changes the meanings of words to suit their revolutionary agenda. "Equity of access" is just another meaning for forced outcomes.

While the ALA states they are in favor of access of ALL library materials for ALL AGES, what they really mean is they want the power to force your children to be indoctrinated with DEI, CRT, Transgender ideology and so on. They call it "freedom of speech," but it's really freedom to brainwash and demoralize your children.

Some books should be relocated and restricted from children, who do not have the emotional and intellectual development to effectively process certain topics. Parents have the authority to choose sexually charged and ideologically-driven books for their children, but not to force other parents' children to be exposed to them willy-nilly on a library shelf. That's just common sense. It has nothing to do with free speech. But the case below--now that's about free speech:

Our latest legal case, which is against the @CityofArmadale! As Declan says, 'thus far and no further'. pic.twitter.com/yQQQRo42Vy

— Free Speech Union of Australia (@FSUofAustralia) October 20, 2025

"Bob Smith" in Disguise

We have our own local cartoon celeb in Christian County. You may run into him while trick-or-treating:

Bob Smith

 

HAPPY HALLOWEEN!

Columbus Day is Back, Baby!

From: It's Columbus Day!

 Columbus Day is a federal holiday, falling on the second Monday in October. In the past, the Christian County Library had used Columbus Day as a Staff Training Day. No mention of Columbus Day. See screenshot above.

In a short and sweet meeting tonight, the Board of Trustees exorcised the last of the ALA out of the handbook, and restored Columbus Day to its rightful place, as well as providing staff an additional training day. Win/win.

The demons were howling again. ;-)

Public #libraries nationwide are wiping out Columbus Day. Here’s something that can be done to wrest control from the @ALALibrary #librarians using public money to attack America. 🇺🇸

School board restores #ColumbusDay!#parenting #moms #dads #tlchat #IndigenousPeoplesDay https://t.co/WIJQXAfiV2

— Dan Kleinman of SafeLibraries® (@SexHarassed) October 14, 2024

Now, we just need the library to shelve some lovely books about Columbus. For kids, D'Aulaire's book, "Columbus." It's a classic book for ages 4-11. Wouldn't it be wonderful for our community's children to access books like this in the library?

Library Board of Trustees Meeting on Tuesday

 

How the Christian County Cabal Selects Candidates

 

Missouri House (Tim Bommel/MO House Communications)

By Gretchen Garrity

“CABAL: A cabal is a group of people who are united in some close design, usually to promote their private views or interests in an ideology, a state, or another community, often by intrigue and usually without the knowledge of those who are outside their group.” Wikipedia

In September 2023 when Missouri state representative Brad Hudson announced he would run for the state senate, local Republican leaders in Christian County began casting about for a candidate—even though the 138th District is composed of only 25% voters in Christian County, and 75% in Stone County. The announcement may have caught the local political machine off guard as they scrambled to find a candidate they would later present to the voters.

At the venue of Hudson’s announcement for the state senate seat, numerous attendees including Steve Stewart who was in leadership at the Christian County Missouri Republican Assembly (MRA), approached Burt Whaley and asked him to run for Hudson’s seat in the 138th District. Whaley was very active in local politics. Christian County Republican Central Committee Chair Don Carriker was present when Stewart asked Whaley to run.

 

A month later in early October, a local businessman, Tom Franiak, announced he would enter the Republican primary as a candidate for state representative. Even though he lost in a landslide against Whaley in 2024, Franiak is again running to unseat Whaley in 2026.

Stone County 2024 primary results

Christian County 2024 primary results

While Franiak asserted he had “helped put together the Young Republicans” (see the latest issues with the national Young Republicans) there seems to have been almost no political involvement before his entry into the race in 2023. He rarely, if ever attended political meetings, was not a member of any local political organizations, and apparently did not even know in which district he lived (there was recent redistricting).

Rep. Bob Titus

Franiak publicly announced it was Rep. Jamie Gragg (140th District) who urged him to run for Hudson’s seat. According to a 2024 voter guide for Stone and Taney counties Franiak stated, “I have regular conversations with many of the current Missouri House of Representatives including Brian Seitz, district 156, Taney County, Jamie Gragg, District 140, Ozark, Jon Patterson, incoming speaker of the house, Alex Riley, incoming House Floor Leader and Chad Perkins, candidate for speaker pro-tem.”

Note that Franiak did not mention conversations with his own representative Brad Hudson or his senator Mike Moon, or Rep. Bob Titus (139th District). Titus, who is a strong conservative and well liked by his constituency, is currently facing a primary opponent in Sandy Karnes. Karnes, who is vice chair of the local central committee and the committee chairwoman of the 7th Congressional District for Christian County, recently announced a primary challenge against Rep. Titus.

Karnes was involved in helping to shut down voting of the grassroots platform at the 2024 state GOP convention. Her husband, Jack, signed one of two challenges to overturn the grassroots slate of officials who had been voted in at the convention. (Lots of background on the events surrounding the 2024 GOP Convention debacle HERE and HERE and HERE, HERE and HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE and HERE.)

Locke and Smith's Legiscore

PRIMARY CHALLENGES AGAINST TWO POPULAR  INCUMBENTS

Ponder for a moment why local GOP leadership would run primary opponents against respected and popular conservative incumbents like Representatives Titus and Whaley. Titus has a 100% rating with CPAC, and is ranked 7 of 163 in the Missouri House of Representatives with the conservative Locke and Smith’s 2025 Legiscore scoring. Whaley, having just finished his first term, is ranked 6 of 163 with Legiscore.

Back to Tom Franiak’s candidacy in the 2024 primary. Some time in September or early October of 2023, Rep. Gragg, central committee vice chair Sandy Karnes, and Les Overall, president of the local MRA in Christian County, interviewed Franiak as a potential candidate to replace the departing Brad Hudson. Also, and this is very important, not one of those who were involved in interviewing Tom Franiak as a candidate for the 138th District actually live in the 138th. Not Don Carriker, not Jamie Gragg, not Sandy Karnes. Yet they were the individuals advocating for one candidate right from the start.

In fact, it was central committee Chair Carriker who asked Gragg to interview Franiak as a potential candidate. Very soon after that interview, Franiak filed papers. Essentially, Christian County political leaders--independently from Stone County--promoted a candidate who would have been the only voter choice on the primary ballot if not for Burt Whaley’s decision to enter the race. Notably, Franiak was also presented as a candidate in Christian County before he was presented in Stone County.

Franiak later spoke at the Stone County MRA’s meeting in October. According to sources, Franiak announced he was doing citizens a favor by running to represent them. It was after this meeting that Burt Whaley was again approached by others and asked to consider running for the 138th District. He continued to mull it over and after prayerful consideration and discussions with Leah, his wife, he announced his candidacy on Dec. 1, 2023.

WHALEY’S LANDSLIDE VICTORY

In a video (HERE), Franiak notes he didn’t need “two months” to consider his run, but knew that God had chosen him to run. Incidentally, Burt Whaley, who did take two months in prayer and consideration, ended up winning in a landslide in both Stone and Christian counties.

Rep. Burt Whaley

Whaley has a long history of public service, from his 20-year career in the U.S. Army to a 28-year career as a teacher, as well as the founder and principal of a successful alternative school.

Whaley was also involved in local Republican politics as a founding member of the Stone County Missouri Republican Assembly (MRA) as well as interim chair of the Stone County Republican Central Committee. As interim chair, Whaley conducted the local Stone County GOP caucus in 2024.

In the same voter guide Whaley had this to say, “I visited [Brad Hudson] in Jefferson City multiple times over the last four legislative sessions. He introduced me to various legislators and staff, several of whom I have built a working relationship with...In 2022, [Congressman] Eric Burlison asked Brad and me to start a Missouri Republican Assembly (MRA) Chapter in Stone County…”

Whaley stood his ground against the internal party opposition and went on to win the election in a landslide. But what happened behind the scenes in 2023-2024 is illustrative of how state and local party politics affect who runs for office. Watch how the Texas grassroots campaign of Theodis Daniel is being systematically undercut by his own party:

Today, we filed a formal ethics complaint against the Harris County GOP for their blatant bias and unfair practices. They’ve failed to share debate locations, denied equal access to resources for Republican members, and the chair even demanded I drop out to back my opponent just… pic.twitter.com/UBSxecogDx

— Theodis Daniel For Congress (@Theodis4Texas18) October 10, 2025

I’ve stayed quiet long enough. It’s time the people know the truth.
Cindy Siegel, the Harris County GOP Chair, personally asked me to drop out of this race because she’s friends with another candidate. That’s not leadership that’s corruption.

I’m not here to play political games… pic.twitter.com/dMPFhTAjZW

— Theodis Daniel For Congress (@Theodis4Texas18) October 11, 2025

Tonight we break the silence.

The people deserve to know the truth about what’s been done to this campaign the bias, the obstruction, and the improprieties inside the Harris County GOP.
We go LIVE at 7:30 PM Pacific.#TeamDanielTX18 #TruthMatters #WeThePeople #TexasStrong 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/Kw2XjWgzlr

— Theodis Daniel For Congress (@Theodis4Texas18) October 10, 2025

These are not isolated incidents, but are being replicated in districts all across our nation, including Missouri. The GOP establishment, which is one wing of the Uniparty that ultimately controls both sides of the aisle, is fighting to maintain dominance. Much like when the establishment infiltrated and destroyed the Tea Party, we are seeing a national attack plan to remove grassroots conservatives and replace them with establishment office holders.

Like Texas, the Uniparty rules in Missouri. It is why a “Republican Super Majority” still manages to be “helpless” while statist and globalist policies across the state and in local areas are implemented. The Uniparty is comprised of the powerful and the rich, and those they seek to place in elected positions.

Bills introduced in the legislature are written by lawyers and lobbyists whose loyalty lies with their paymasters in business and politics. They advance the interests of the powerful and wealthy and most legislation has little to do with advancing freedom or preserving liberty. The legislative games played are for another article, however.

THE LOCAL CABAL
 

Back to local politics. As soon as the largely unknown Tom Franiak announced his run in Oct. 2023 (MEC papers were filed on Oct. 9), he was being promoted by the establishment. In fact, after Burt Whaley announced his candidacy he spoke with central committee Chair Don Carriker, who urged him not to run against Franiak. The exact same talking points he used were later used by other politically-aligned activists who spoke with Whaley and urged him not to run.

In fact, both Titus and Whaley were integral members of the conservative contingent called the Brave Ten, who defied the GOP establishment in Jefferson City to support Justin Sparks for House Speaker, rather than RINO Jon Patterson. And now both conservative incumbents are facing primary opponents who are closely identified with the GOP establishment.

When Carriker could not talk Whaley out of running, he asked Whaley to consider paying Franiak for his campaign costs up to that point if Franiak dropped out of the race. Whaley declined.

Again, few politically active people had heard of Tom Franiak. The first time Whaley heard of him was in Oct. 2023 when he got a call requesting he invite Franiak to the October meeting of the Stone County MRA. Also, it was Whaley who first introduced Franiak to Sen. Mike Moon at that meeting.

Tom FraniakSpringfield Business Journal

REPUBLICAN BONAFIDES

It is interesting to go back and note who Franiak said he regularly spoke with, including representatives Jamie Gragg and Jon Patterson, incoming speaker of the house. Who put Franiak in touch with Patterson, widely considered to be an establishment politician? One connection may be Axiom Strategies, a Republican organization that helps plan and execute campaigns for political candidates.

How and why did Christian County political leaders settle on Tom Franiak who was mostly unknown in local political circles before his announcement? He had little to no active engagement with local grassroots groups or political organizations, although he was active in community life. Franiak’s candidacy would have caused few waves, except for the way he was promoted by the local cabal over grassroots candidate Whaley. Why oppose voter choice for the best candidate when there was no incumbent?

WHEN LIFE BEGINS

At a February 13, 2024 CCMRA meeting, Franiak and Whaley both spoke. One of the questions revolved around when life begins. It became apparent that the candidates were divided. Although Franiak stated that life begins at conception, he elaborated by saying, “[Life] begins at conception, yes, for my religion. But there is no way to detect it medically so I will be very transparent here and say if Missouri was to pass a Morning After Pill I don't see it being much different than any other contraceptive, because we cannot detect a heartbeat. We cannot tell whether the cell has been divided, um, I believe that in order to be a great legislator you're going to have compromise. I can plant my feet in the ground and I can say absolutely no compromise, but we'll never win that battle. The liberals will come after you every time. So, in order to be a great legislator in Jeff City you're going to have to be open to some compromise. But one thing I will do is stand up here and tell you exactly where I will compromise and that's one of them.”

Whaley, who taught biology during his career as an educator, stated that life begins at conception, which is typically between 12 and 24 hours. Whaley would not compromise on that point.

At that same meeting, Don Carriker complained that Whaley had too much power in Stone County because he was president of the MRA and was the temporary chair of Stone County central committee (until a new chair could be elected). In light of primary challenger Sandy Karnes and her influential positions with the local and 7th Congressional District’s committees, this concern of Carriker is interesting.

Soon after that meeting, Rep. Gragg invited Franiak and Whaley out to the restaurant Rosie Jo’s in Ozark to resolve any possible division that may have occurred. It was also at this meeting that Gragg noted to Whaley it was Carriker who asked him to confer with Franiak, Karnes and Overall about a possible run for representative of the 138th District.

THE MOU IS DOA

When it came time for candidate endorsements the Stone and Christian County MRA chapters met to come to an agreement for the 75% of the voting populace who resided in Stone County. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was hammered out to give the endorsement responsibility to the Stone County MRA. This MOU was written and approved by the 7th District MRA for the March endorsements. Make note that Sandy Karnes voted against the MOU at that time.

Sandy Karnes

However, the MOU was rescinded in a Feb. 16, 2024 MRA memorandum sent by 7th District Second Vice President Ronnie White. Stating the MOU  "...may not be fully aligned with the State MRA Bylaws," the rescission came three days after the February meeting at which Carriker complained about Whaley wielding too much power.  

 

There was a Board meeting but it is not clear how the decision came about at the State level--whether there was a vote or simply a discussion and decision. According to sources, Carriker made an issue of the MOU and was supported by Steve Lampley, who was MRA President at the time. It was believed that Whaley would win the endorsement of the MRA, and it seems obvious there was establishment opposition to it.

That is not all. The 7th District’s Convention occurred on March 23, 2024. During the convention, local MRA leaders Ron Sanders and Ronnie White proposed a procedural change for endorsements to allow the MRA to do what the MOU would have done. The proposal passed. The Stone County MRA members in the 138th could now vote on the endorsement, and indeed Whaley was overwhelmingly endorsed at the next meeting on April 18, 2024.

Note that Tom Franiak’s wife, Donni, had just become a brand new member of the Christian County MRA. It was Donni who nominated her husband for endorsement at the Stone County MRA. Donni Franiak currently serves as the secretary of the Christian County central committee.

THE VETTING QUESTION

At an April 2024 patriot group meeting in Barry County, Don Carriker questioned Whaley on the vetting of candidates. Carriker was wearing a Tom Franiak campaign shirt at that meeting while Chair of the central committee at the time. During the question-and-answer portion of the meeting, central committee Chair Carriker asked central committee Temporary Chair Whaley why Stone County did not vet candidates like Christian County.

That turned out to be a great question, considering that Carriker and his father originated the vetting survey for REPACCMO, the Republican Association of Central Committees of Missouri. There have been many questions to date about the “survey” used to vet local candidates: who was carrying out the vetting, whether the actual questions constituted a professional survey or a test (two distinct things), and how the survey was prepared.

 
VETTING USED AS A WEAPON?

 

On June 27, 2024 the Christian County central committee, through Chair Don Carriker, filed suit against Christian County Clerk Paula Brumfield for allowing Christian County Highway Superintendent Brent Young to file as a Republican on the ballot for the upcoming election for Western County Commissioner.

What may not be well known is that Carriker and Young, in his capacity as highway superintendent, reportedly had a conflict over bridge construction that happened to impact some of Carriker’s property. 

 

Yet Young was still forced to go to Carriker’s home for the vetting process instead of a neutral location. He was told he failed to make the benchmark scoring as a Republican. He was called in to a meeting with central committee members, who later determined Young “was not Republican enough.” This, even though Young had been vouched for by a member of the central committee and was a lifelong Republican. At the time, not all of those members themselves had taken the test or were vetted.

 

When Young filed with the County Clerk’s office anyway, the Central Committee "by and through Don Carriker, Chairman" sued. The suit, which also named Susan Pathkiller (a public administrator in Christian County) was dismissed after Carriker and his attorney failed to appear for a court date. A later motion by Carikker to set aside the dismissal was denied. 

 

Young later lost a close race to Johnny Williams.

From: Missouri Ethics Commission

Meanwhile, back in February 2024, Whaley was not allowed to have someone other than Carriker vet him, even though it was clear to Whaley that Carriker was supporting Franiak, indeed had contributed to his campaign (see above). Whaley was well conversant with how a survey should be written and conducted. He asked Carriker a series of questions about surveys, and found that the survey was not properly formulated.

Carriker admitted that he did not have 50% Democrats beta-testing the survey, which would have been needed in order to validate it. The vast majority of beta-testers were Republicans—taking a Republican test. There was no control group, no variable group to test against. Carriker controlled the vetting process in Christian County and was unwilling to allow another individual to vet either Whaley or Young, even though there were obvious conflicts of interest. 

  In a a strange twist of events, Carriker was kicked out of REPACCMO's chat group in early 2025 after some apparent divisiveness. David Rice, of Hick Christian, shared a text message from Carriker, complaining about Rice.

 

GRASSROOTS VS ESTABLISHMENT

The type of maneuvers and strategies the political parties engage in can be disheartening to citizens. Some politically active individuals consider themselves operators and power brokers. They toady up to moneyed interests,  seek their own self-interests, and forget that civic action should benefit all the citizenry and not just a few individuals and groups. The GOP has an entrenched establishment cabal, even in Christian County, that seeks to wrest control back from two actual grassroots conservatives who have servant hearts (listen to both Titus and Whaley on a recent radio show).
  

The local cabal is desperate enough to attempt to unseat two popular representatives who rank high for their conservative voting records. Most of all, they count on the average Missourian to be ignorant and too busy to see what is going on.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.