Monday, July 17, 2023

A Conversation with Rep. Jamie Gragg

 

 

Rep. Jamie Gragg

Right To Win Ozarks spoke last Friday with Missouri State Rep. Jamie Gragg (R) 140th District about a recent meeting he had with Secretary of State John R. Ashcroft.

How did the meeting go with Mr. Ashcroft?

Rep. Gragg: The meeting went fantastic. We were able to sit down with him and a few of his staff, including the state librarian, and shared with him a couple of the ideas I’m shooting for this next legislative session, bill wise. He was very excited about both of them. Of course his office can only go so far because it’s not their wheelhouse, it’s not what they do, and due to different office limitations they can only do so many things as well. But there were some good suggestions, good brainstorming ideas from all that were there. Rep. [Brad] Hudson was there as well.

What idea stands out to you about the meeting—what suggestions?

Rep. Gragg: Not to let too many details out that are still being hammered, [but] a paradigm shift of how things will be done, is kind of what we are looking at because right now the thought process—when you say ‘book rating system’--I know every library across the state and probably across the country is thinking, 'We don’t have the staff to do that. We have to create this whole monster for the thousands and thousand of books we’ve got. Who has the time, effort and energy to do that?' And I get that. I get that.

To me, anything worth doing...is worth doing right...that’s my mindset, but I also understand if you’re not quite on board and you’re given a herculean task you kind of shut down. And so I’m sure that’s kind of where they’re at, as well. [So] paradigm shifting it so that it becomes a standard from outside organizations instead of internal...because right now if you get a book from let’s say Random House it has been written as a children’s book--here’s the topic--and Random House will give it to the organizations that make the determination of where it’s listed and shelved at. Well we’re gonna go to these organizations now instead, so that it is more of a standard instead of something the individual libraries have to do.

Now is that like the ALA or the MLA that you are talking about?

Rep. Gragg: Oh no no no, that’s a four letter word. No we’re talking, uh, there are separate organizations out
there that assist libraries when it comes to layouts...

Cataloging you mean?

Rep. Gragg: Cataloging, yes, thank you, that is the word that was trying to come into my mouth but I couldn’t
spit it out.

There is a whole lot of ways of cataloging books they’ve largely, they’re starting to,
abandon the
Dewey Decimal System...

Rep. Gragg: Yes. This would be kind of sliding into that middle ground, so it’s after the publication but before it hits the library...every library uses some sort of cataloging system whether it’s this, that or the
other--ABC cataloging or XYZ cataloging system--so we’re going to see if we can slide into that
level. It will become more of a standard in the industry instead of saying ‘Libraries you messed up
this is what you gotta do now and we’re going to legislate it that way’.

So this is just my question about it because I’ve been doing a little dive into it, that...
every librarian can do it differently and it’s the wild west when it comes to cataloging and
classifying books.
And some will use the Dewey Decimal System in the adult section, and
they won’t use it in the children’s section, and there’s a whole huge amount of woke
Marxist ways of classifying and cataloging books so yeah, I mean its really..that’s a
little..umm...

Rep. Gragg: And you do find that more with your smaller libraries, unfortunately because you do have, you’ve still got volunteers in a lot of the smaller libraries. You’re gonna have one volunteer that she just loves the children’s section, that is her baby and we don’t mess with it because if we do that it messes with her system, or his, I don’t want to go in the wrong direction here. That is that individual section there and we’re gonna do it the way we’re gonna do it. And you see that. Your bigger library systems they tend to universalize their whole building because that way when children get older they’re not having to learn a whole new system to go the toddler section, to the children section, to the young adult section, and on and on.

Did anybody bring up the ALA or the kind of connections that are going on with the MLA?

Rep. Gragg: I did because after we’d had our brainstorming session, and we discussed various things that we can do—you know I like to have all the eggs laid out on the table and talk about all of them and all angles they can come from—so I said, “Okay guys, now we’ve discussed some tactics of what we’re gonna do, now let’s talk about the push back, the ALA. And they all stopped me right there and giggled. ‘We don’t care about them.’ So, the state librarian [Robin Westphal] gave me a little bit of hope. She said, “I think you’d be surprised how few libraries in the State of Missouri are actually ALA members. There’s not as many as you think.”

Now I don’t know what ‘Not as many as you think’ is to her. Is that 50%, is that 20%, 100%? I don’t know what that means. She definitely is one that understands the issues that are going on right now, and she’s on board with us. She thinks that there is definitely a problem. So it was very encouraging. And she has worked in libraries of all sizes. From the small two-librarian systems to the St. Louis library systems, so she has been involved in the whole gambit in the state. She knows the issues, she knows it’s a problem and she agrees with us that it needs to be fixed, and taken care of.

From her words to my ears was the ALA is not as strong in Missouri as the ALA has made it out to be. Now the MLA, we didn’t breach that one. But we will be learning about how maybe they are in the state and really kind of what it will take to put them in a pen if we need to.

Yeah, it’s kind of more of a reform type thing...Did you feel like Sec. Ashcroft had a good knowledge of the situation?

Rep. Gragg: More so than I’d even hoped. I was able to bring book binders with me, put together by Mary Hernandez de Carl here in Nixa, and she’s been wonderful about doing that. And I brought three extras with me, that she put together, and I put them on the table, and Jay was like, ‘Oh I know what’s in here. I’ve gotten the texts. I do not need to…’ And you could tell he was, it disgusted him enough what he has seen already. He says, ‘Please don’t ask me to open this up because I know what’s in here.’

And one of his other staff members opens it up and of course opened up probably to one of the worst pages and quickly slams it shut. And he’s an adult individual who probably would not be embarrassed by much, but the fact that what he opened it up to was enough. It was instantaneously bad. So they know what’s out there, they know what it looks like…Again, they knew more than I thought they would.

Let me change tack a little bit. Do you have any suggestions on what citizens can do right now to try and get this fixed? How we can assist our elected officials?

Rep. Gragg: You know, first and foremost letting voices be heard. What does that look like? I am a firm believer in you get more bees with honey than you do with vinegar. So when you’re voice is being heard, it doesn’t mean arguments, it doesn’t mean, you know, doing things to turn people the other direction. It means rationally saying these are my children, or these are my grandchildren. We are in charge of what goes into their brains. We should be the ones to make the decision, not somebody telling us what we have to put in their brains.

If I go to the library, the library should be built around the desires and the culture that the library exists in...not the East and the West coasts saying, ‘Hey Midwest, this is what you guys should be doing’. It should match your community, and the people that live here should be voicing their opinion to say, ‘This library has pushed us out. Instead of meeting the community needs and wants you’ve run us out and now you’ve got a niche that is taking the library and you’re meeting their needs.' 

The marketing in the library has gone bye-bye. It no longer exists. They’re not marketing to the community. They’ve pigeon-holed themselves to what they think we should have. Let their voices be heard. That’s the ultimate one right there.

What would you say to people who are afraid to engage because of push back from the left? For instance, the U Turn in Education group down here that’s been very loud, and they’ve even berated Commissioners Morris [and Jackson]…? And some of the local parents have been doxxed and so how do we overcome that…?

Rep. Gragg: First and foremost know that they don’t play by rational tactics. They don’t. It’s terroristic contact is what they do. And I’ve been a victim of that as well to some extent. I will say that some people, their gift is not to engage. And that’s fine. Their gift may be behind the scenes. Their gift may be planning and organizing an event or something like that. So don’t think just because you are with the [grassroots group] or the parents group that wants to make their library better. [It] doesn’t mean that you have to engage. So don’t think they have to by any means. Stand firm. Sometimes a quiet stance speaks louder than the words.

I’ll throw this out, I will give a church analogy. Some people are not meant to teach Sunday School. They’re not meant to organize fellowship suppers. Their gift is to pray. Their gift is to be the support that way. So everyone has a gift, everyone has a spot.

Do you have anything that you’d like to share, [any] particular point that you’d like to make?

Rep. Gragg: You know, just know that this has a very positive effect and by what I’ve seen happening right now, we’re turning this ship in the right direction. You can’t turn a big ship on a dime, by any means. It does take time, but we have positive direction going on right now.

Growing up, and this is a little back story here. One of my favorite Sunday School teachers was a lady named Louella Long. She worked at the library and she was one of those ladies who had her section and it grew to where she was a full librarian. This is not the same library that Louella Long used to be in charge of. And this is the same building, right down here by the park.

What we have done is we have taken that thought process of ‘These are the professionals, these are the folks taking care of our libraries, they’re doing a great job’, and we’ve become hands off. If there’s one thing that Covid did, it made parents see and pay attention to what their kids bring home now. I think that’s where this stems from, and I think it’s time that parents have their eyes opened. We took our eyes off the library for so long and trusted the professionals for too long. And now we see the damage done. We should never let our guard down. We should always have checks and balances in place, and this fight that’s happening right now, we’re taking it back, and we’re going to hopefully make sure that’s there’s constantly going to be checks and balances in place, and we’ll have a better library for it.

When did you become aware of this issue? A lot of politicians are not wanting to engage with it, but you’ve engaged...

Rep. Gragg: I’ll admit I was just as guilty as the average citizen around here. My kids are grown up and so the library is not as much as an everyday part of my life as much as it was when my kids were in the house. My youngest is 22 now. So, but I have grandchildren coming up...but when I was approached by this and I saw some of the books, gosh, it was before I was even in office. I’d say probably the middle of last year, so about a year ago, and I was shown some of the things that are in there. And I was like, “No, that can’t be real, that can’t be right. No, no no. And then I found it was true and it was right, and it really disturbed me, so…”

And so me and Mary Hernandez de Carl have actually been talking since before I took office in January, and we tried to get some stuff going last year, but it was really, we were on the wrong side of the Eight Ball, to get something for last legislative session in place, so it’s taken us time. Unfortunately, the library books are still in there. But we’re definitely gonna have it in for this year. So we’re working on [it] with that meeting with Jay Ashcroft and so forth.

And so, you said there’s three separate bills that are going be introduced in the new session?

Rep. Gragg: Well, there’s two for sure. I would like to formulate a third when it comes to organizations like the ALA and the MLA, but I think one of the bills...is going to be the rating system that we’ve discussed. The other one is our library boards by and large across the state are hand-picked from within. This is a tax-funded system here, where the people on the board spend tax dollars, so there is no taxation with representation. That goes against our model, our setup. If we have people spending tax dollars then the people who are putting the money into that tax base should have representation on how it is spent.

So, one of my bills will be that library boards have to be an elected board, much like your school boards. That way we, you, everybody else, your neighbors, your family that live here in Christian County have a say-so on who’s spending the money that they are paying into to fund our libraries. And that local elected board will make those decisions that we’ve elected them to do, and hopefully that will follow through with...outside organizations like the ALA and MLA who we are giving money to. We have more accountability because we’re electing people to make those important decisions for us.

Thank you so much for taking time with us this afternoon. We really appreciate it.

Rep. Gragg: Not a problem at all. I appreciate the time to sit down and take a breath, first and foremost, and to answer any questions people have. If I’m not sharing with you guys what’s going on and not hearing from you guys what’s going on, then I’m doing it wrong.


(Rep. Gragg's Committee Assignments include Children and Families, Elementary and Secondary Education, Healthcare Reform, and the Subcommittee on Appropriations--Education. He can reached at  (573) 751-2565 and jamieray.gragg@house.mo.gov.)

Contributors: Deborah Spindle, Gretchen Garrity



36 comments:

  1. Yet another politician that doesn't have a clue how libraries function. We have a hard enough time trying to find board members willing to serve on library boards, if they have to do a political campaign we won't have enough board members. As for the rating system books are already categorized by age appropriateness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please enlighten us on how libraries function.

      Delete
    2. Wrong on both statements there over 20 applications for 2 open board seats. Age appropriate ratings have not stopped children from access so placement is important.

      Delete
  2. Dude hasnt been in a library in years and it shows. MORON

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just because you are a tax payer doesn't give you the knowledge of the cataloging/purchasing of a library. Do tax payers tell MODOT how to resurface roads, build bridges? Also, COVID has nothing to do with this mess. What COVID did was shine a BRIGHT light on what our classroom teachers deal with on a daily basis. Parent's are responsible for their kids, what they do, where they go and what they read. Rep. Gragg, go back in your hole!!!!! And take the Secretary of State with you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How can parents be responsible for what their children read when libraries and schools permit an "anything goes" policy regarding books? Please help us understand.

      Delete
    2. Um, I don't know, maybe go to the library with your kid? Talk to your kid, spend time with them, set your own rules for them. Since when did our local librarians agree to take on the responsibility of parenting YOUR child?

      Delete
  4. Anyone who supports this is absolutely clueless. Parents and Guardians need to take responsibility. I for one, refuse to let my son grow up and be embarrassed by the human form. You can de-sexualize. Oh wait, you would have to actually teach and guide a child, instead you throw them in church and let the church raise your kids. Check the statistics on child sexual abuse in church. I would hope it makes your jaw drop. When I was growing up, the church kids had the best drugs, the most sex and the most abortions. I stayed away because they were the bad kids. The whole issue here is that you don't want to take responsibility for screwing your child up. Put it all in God's hands right? Let's not try to stop child abuse, let's ban books that teach a child how to find a voice to stand up to their abuser because it makes YOU uncomfortable. The people that think the "bad" stuff that is making kids "bad" is in the library you are so mistaken! They hear you and see you when you don't think they are paying attention. You want to help you child be a successful adult? GET THEM IN THERAPY ASAP! Make yourself an appointment while you are at it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The books with porn don't belong in the library. Most taxpayers and parents don't want them in there.

      Delete
    2. Libraries do not have porn in their collections. Maybe go grab a dictionary and look up the definition.

      Delete
    3. A desire that your kids be exposed to sexually explicit and obscene materials does not negate the majority of parents' rights to restrict access to those unacceptable books. Those books are widely available in many other avenues.

      And yes, books that meet the legal definition of porn have been found in school and public libraries. The American Library Association pushes such books to children as a matter of social policy.

      Delete
  5. As a cataloger at a MO public library I can say for certain that neither of these people have any clue as to what they're talking about when it comes to what actually goes on in both libraries and publishing. I would not be surprised if Rep. Jamie Gragg hasn't read a book in his life. I mean, how could he, when he spends all his time thinking about children's genitals?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a disgusting comment. That a person who would make such a comment works at a public library is distressing, to say the least.

      Delete
    2. Distressing but not surprising. Pretty easy to tell the “type” of people who’d argue on behalf of these books…. PERVERTS

      Delete
  6. Note to those who comment. Keep it civil and make cogent arguments, or comments will be closed. To suggest Rep. Gragg is ignorant of how libraries function, or that he doesn't read, etc., shows a lack of thinking skills on the part of the people commenting, or at the least, an unthinking anger that has clouded their judgment.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is garbage. I've heard from folks that the state librarian said no such things--if you're going to pretend to do journalism, you need to fact check. Do better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do tell! Are you suggesting the state librarian is not aware of the issues involving children having access to smut in the library?

      Delete
    2. Please publish actual evidence of the "smut" and "pornography" you have allegedly found in Missouri libraries, that is purported to be contained in the mysterious three ring binder that Rep. Gragg, based on your description, is carrying around like his own personal scrapbook. The way your commentary reads, it sounds like he shared this documentation with you purely for the shock value of your supposed "reporting". By failing to provide any actual evidence, you are simply promoting alternative "facts" that have no basis in reality.

      Delete
    3. How silly of you. I suggest you do some research for yourself. You can start with the articles on this blog that detail the sexualized books that are being pushed on children. You really can't hide the evidence anymore. I'm so sorry you prefer to be the type that wants to destroy children's innocence. It's not too late to change.

      Here's a taste of what's out there:

      https://twitter.com/ChrisLXXXVI/status/1681564887691198464

      Delete
    4. I do my own research and fact checking, and social media isn't a reliable source of factual information. You also have no basis whatsoever to assert that I want to "destroy children's innocence" simply because I'm asking you to verify your unsubstantiated claims. All that is required is to publish a list of titles/authors/ISBNs for the material that is contained in Gragg's binder, which you reported on. Referring to your own blog and linking to twitter is not providing facts. Providing facts to support your claims is not my responsibility, it's yours. You're the one claiming Gragg's binder contains "sexualized books", not me. If you were actually a journalist doing unbiased reporting rather than blogging political propaganda, you would understand this.

      Delete
    5. You can access lots of websites like Booklooks.org or Booklook.info or many more that give the information you are seeking. And I'm interested in why YOU are so interested in the contents of the binder. I did not claim a thing about the binders. You don't have your facts straight. If you want access to sexually explicit children's books I suggest you go right to the ALA's website and click on their Rainbow Reading List for 2023.

      Delete
  8. Let’s boil this interview down a bit.

    First, what is the problem being presented?

    According to Rep. Gragg, and from what anyone knows about the SOS, they believe the issue to be a small number of offensive books out of the millions that Missouri libraries have. And yes, offensive if the best term to use here because the books offend some. And yes, small compared to the number of items that are owned by MO libraries in total.

    What is their proposed solution?

    To force libraries to spend countless number of tax dollars to reclassify all their material. And yes, we would have to do ALL our materials because if we only did it for come books it constitutes a form of censorship.

    This takes man hours and more than you know, as books would need to be more closely scrutinized to determine a “rating”. This takes more time than traditional cataloging and therefore more staff pay.

    This also means somehow adding this rating system to library ILS systems in a way that differentiates it as a rating. ILS systems are not necessarily designed to do such a thing in a way that would accomplish this goal. Not only that but how are you going to force big ILS vendors to spend their resources and funding to recode their systems to accomplish this? If they are not willing to do so, it means having to subscribe to another service (referred to as a discovery service/layer) in order to do so. Those are not cheap.

    It can mean moving or expanding shelves to accommodate new organization systems, again time and money (tax payer money).

    The desired outcome?

    Simply put, all the above in order for libraries to be inclined (forced, if you will) to catalog and shelve these small number of offensive books in a way that hides (censors) them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don’t libraries already have established cataloging practices in place?

      Yes, they do. There is no one way to catalog an item, but there are standards out there that libraries follow.

      How are books actually cataloged?

      Cataloging involves using a set of classification fields that tell information about a book. This is typically represented by a MARC record which states title, author, physical dimensions of a book, subject matter, etc… Library systems utilize these records to retrieve items based on search terms. One can search the title field and the system looks at the MARC’s title fields for matches. The same can be said for author, subject etc…

      Where does the information comes from for cataloging?

      The information used to catalog books does often come from the publishers who place that information in the books. Some libraries employ their own catalogers, some may use volunteers, however many some form of pre-formed MARC record from repositories including the vendor and other libraries that have complete MARC records. With so many small libraries in MO, there is little to no original cataloging that takes place. Many MARC records for children’s books already contain recommended age ranges. If one disagrees with the publisher’s age recommendations, take it up with them.

      How are books shelved?

      This is where Dewey or other organization systems come in. These systems are what libraries use to determine where books go in a library. The information used is that which is cataloged which again, comes from the publisher. So, if a book is sold as a children’s book and the publisher indicates this in the book’s information, it is going to be put in the children’s section. Not every library uses the same system and some use varying systems throughout their library. However, they are all based on the same things: age level, subject, author, title. All this information, is again provided from the publisher.

      So how would a rating system make a library not house offensive materials for children in the children’s section when the publisher is telling us that it is made for children? If the system is merely to make parent’s aware of a potential offensive book that is still to be found in the children’s section, does it not still require parents to be involved in the selection of books?

      Delete
    2. Wait, so if most libraries pull their information from the publisher (not just MO libraries), why not go after them for targeting our youth with offensive material?

      You need to ask yourself this question. Why is our government targeting something as American as the public library instead of going after those producing the offensive material?

      You determine your own answer, but here are some others to consider. Who is the easier target?

      ALA and MLA

      The question I pose to Rep. Gragg is this. Do you really know how the ALA works? Libraries do not have to belong to the organization to follow their practices. They are the AMERICAN Library Association, and as such as set a standard that public libraries in the US can elect to follow. While it’s true that no library is forced to follow their standards, I bet if you do your homework you’d be surprised how many do in some way.

      Your response makes it sound as if you really do not understand their influence in MO or the country for that matter.

      As far as reaching out to the MLA, are you only planning to or will you actually do so?

      I’d like to hear Robin Westfall’s response to your interview to see if she can corroborate your claims.

      Delete
    3. How are library boards determined?

      This is another place where Rep. Gragg really needs to brush up on how libraries function. He is making blanket statements about library boards without posting any research. While I imagine it is different across the state, my library does not determine board members from within. They are recommended by our Mayor and approved by city council. Our Mayor and City Council an elected official and therefore represents the people. The board members they appoint are citizens of our community and therefore represent its members.

      How to library boards function?

      Again, I cannot speak to all boards, but here is how mine works. Our board hires our library director. The director makes policy and manages the library and its staff. When the director and their management team come up with new policy (which are heavily researched with our community in mind), it is presented to the board. The board may ask questions, seek clarifications, ask for alterations, etc.… Once they are ready, they vote on said policies.
      They allow the trained professionals manage the library. It is the trained professional’s job to prepare policy and the board to approve or reject it.

      Elected boards will have political agendas and we all know where that leads. How soon will it be before those elected officials want to be paid? How soon will it be before they are the ones actually doing the job of the director and determining for all their community what your children can and cannot read? Who will actually want to do this?

      Do libraries know their communities?

      Rep. Gragg claims that libraries are out of touch with their communities and the they are now running rampant. Well how are those libraries still functioning if this is the case? Libraries that do not represent their communities are not going to have any patronage. Their circulation will drop and budgets will be cut as a result which will only spiral until the library fails completely. Well that’s not happening at my library or the other dozens of libraries in my area, many of which are seeing a rise in use compared to pre-COVID levels.

      My library is now being used at the same level if not more that prior to COVID? Hmm…. That seems odd considering Rep. Gragg is so sure that libraries and librarians have lost touch with their communities.

      Delete
    4. What about the recent instituted Rule 15 CSR 30-200.015?

      Oh, you mean the rule that the SOS put into effect despite the majority being against it? That rule put into place new criteria for libraries that threatens to cut their state funding if they do not comply. I’ll not summarize it, but you can find it here. BTW, when the public comment period opened for this, there were about 20,000 pages of comments that came in, the VAST majority were against the rule (I know because I helped analyze it). The SOS enacted it anyway.

      Basically, among other things, this rule was put into place to make sure libraries had a system in place to allow the public to challenge any item in a library’s collection (lot of libraries already had this in place, BTW). This was done in response to the same books that Rep Gragg and Mary Hernandez de Carl (this article claims that the binder put together was familiar to the SOS) are taking issue with.

      This rule was only enacted a few months ago, yet Rep. Gragg claims that, ”Unfortunately, the library books are still in there.”

      Of course, they are still there. Most are not challenging them and you’ve only given them a few months to do so. Correct me if I’m wrong, Rep. Gragg, but what I am reading from this is that you won’t be satisfied until the books in question are just gone.

      Doesn’t this open a can of worms for libraries?

      It does indeed. Imagine that Rep. Gragg and others get their way. Right now, this is just a proposed idea for a bill to make it easier for them to hide books they deem offensive. But what comes next? Does the government mandate that we remove them from the shelves? Do they move onto other books that are offensive for other reasons? What about the steamy romance novels? What about history books that you no longer agree with? What about circulating technology that help many who cannot afford it on their own? How about books by authors you just do not agree with?

      In a state where many citizens do not want to government in their lives, overstepping their bounds, are we content with allowing them to control our libraries? What’s next, limited what you can stream on Netflix, or purchase from Amazon?

      Delete
    5. Is there another way to address the issue?

      Rep. Gragg answers this question in his own words…
      “It means rationally saying these are my children, or these are my grandchildren. We are in charge of what goes into their brains. We should be the ones to make the decision, not somebody telling us what we have to put in their brains.”

      You heard is from his mouth. Let PARENTS and GRANDPARENTS determine what goes into their children’s brains. What does this mean?
      • Raise your children to be good people.
      • Raise them to know the difference between right and wrong.
      • Raise them to be tolerant of other human beings
      • Raise them to know the world around them, because that is what they will encounter whether you like it or not.

      Then when they encounter materials you find objectionable they will be more likely to avoid them as they will either understand that such materials are wrong.

      And if you really do not want them viewing offensive materials, then…
      • Screen their library checkouts.
      • Better yet, be active parents and go to the library with them so you can see what they are selecting. YOU and only you are responsible for what your child does, not libraries. We have a saying at my library that we will not act “in parentis loco”, meaning we will not act in place of a parent. Doing so opens a whole other can of worms that we as libraries need to avoid.
      • And since you find offensive books objectionable why not cancel your various streaming services, forbid your kids access to the internet, don’t give them smartphones at an early age, etc…
      • Just be a parent and spend your time managing YOUR kids rather than acting “in parentis loco” for the entire State of Missouri.

      The last thing I’ll point out about his statement. Who is saying that your children HAVE to put anything in their brains? Is it really libraries? Or is it parents? Perhaps this issue wouldn’t be so much of an issue if MO parents were better parents. Hmmm… if only MO could establish programs to better support parents (MO has a surplus budget this year BTW) maybe we wouldn’t be in this mess. A mess that has gained national attention over the last year and painted MO as a backwater state.

      Delete
    6. Summary

      Some MO politicians, Rep. Gragg included, want to enact a new law that requires libraries to spend vast amounts of funding and time so they can make is harder to find some offensive material.

      Contrary to this article, if the proper research is done, I imagine it will show that (beyond housing a few offensive books) most MO libraries are not really doing anything wrong and that they are loved by their communities.

      Well, Rep. Gragg, why not tackle the bigger issues instead?
      Why are you and other MO politicians (whose salaries are paid with MO tax dollars), spending your valuable time, energy and our tax dollars tackling what seems like a small issue? What about poverty, poor education, homelessness, crime and violence? Why are you not trying to address social issues that are destroying our state?

      Will you actually speak with the ALA or the MLA? Nobody likes to have hard conversations, especially when they know there will be push-back, but you cannot make these blind assumptions without getting the facts.

      Will you actually speak with MO library directors and their boards to learn how things are done?

      Or will you make blanket assumptions about all MO libraries based on a few?

      When will you and other MO politicians really listen to the majority (many who have already voiced their concerns) instead of tacking an issue that a minority supports? I have friends who are pastors and while they object to the subject matter of the offensive books, they are against removing them from libraries. They know it is their responsibility to bring up their children and raise them the way they see fit.

      Are you only factoring in what MO citizens want or are you listening to those extreme activist groups who work nationwide? Are you letting people from other parts of the country influence how you are representing MO?

      This boils down to one word.
      CONTROL

      Delete
    7. You said, "This is where Dewey or other organization systems come in. These systems are what libraries use to determine where books go in a library. The information used is that which is cataloged which again, comes from the publisher. So, if a book is sold as a children’s book and the publisher indicates this in the book’s information, it is going to be put in the children’s section. Not every library uses the same system and some use varying systems throughout their library. However, they are all based on the same things: age level, subject, author, title. All this information, is again provided from the publisher."

      If librarians do not know what they have on their shelves because the publisher told them one thing, then that is an issue. Many of the books that are sexually explicit, that deal with gender ideology are deemed for children or teens...by the publisher. Cannot librarians figure out that the publisher is PUSHING books and at the least review what comes in for children? And can they not understand that those books, which are designed to indoctrinate children about vastly age-inappropriate subjects should be shelved in age-appropriate spaces? This is not rocket science.

      The cataloging and classifications are the determining factor. A book about gender ideology, whether geared toward a toddler or an adult, should be in a section about...gender ideology. The child does not have access, but the adult does. By classifying and cataloging a book as a "children's book," activist publishers and librarians can locate sexually inappropriate books in the children's section. This is just what is happening. And it is a pandemic in public libraries, including Christian County.

      I would love to hear what the state librarian has to say about membership in the ALA, which is extreme in its views and is adamant about pushing sexually explicit and political agendas through the public library system.

      That you are seeing a rise in your library's patronage is more likely because of the many social services that are being increasingly offered through them and not because moms and dads are thrilled to have to thread the bookish landmines in the children's section. Libraries have become a vector for social activism, and it's a shame.

      You are being strident with your fearmongering. All that is being asked, is that books that violate community standards, and state and federal laws, be RESTRICTED to an appropriate section of the library, that they be rated so busy parents and caregivers can quickly determine whether a book is appropriate or not.

      If the indoctrination of children was not a POTENT FEATURE of our library systems, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Activists do it because it works. Stop putting needles on the playground, and parents will feel better about letting their children play there.

      I cannot imagine a more important issue than protecting children from noxious influences.

      But thanks for your (voluminous) comment(s).


      Delete
    8. "strident in your feamongering" LOL - look in the mirror!

      Delete
    9. At least you were brief this time. ;-)

      Delete
  9. It is a simple solution. Hold parents & guardians accountable each for their own children. The library is for everyone but not every book is for everyone. If you see something that is objectionable to you or is against your morals and beliefs, walk on past. Not everyone is held to your personal moral code. That may not be a book I would choose but it is nice to know, as an American, I have the freedom to choose to read it or not. If I go with my child to the library and they see a book I would rather they did not check out, I will sit them down and discuss why I would rather they did not. I have only ever seen children's books in the children's section of my library. I feel, in my experience, libraries generally curate a responsible collection and have contingencies in place for books people feel are not appropriate for a libraries collection. The library does not determine nor know every single thing that is in every book, nor do they know what every single individual is going to allow their children to check out. It is not their responsibility. That lies in the hands SOLELY of the parent or guardian. The library is only responsible for providing the information and housing the books. Why not have the publishers be held more accountable for their age categorization of books for children, if you have an issue with their choices? Also keep in mind, once we start restricting some information, it is a slippery slope to the restriction of ANY information.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Parents do not always have kids that are looking in the same section of the library. Parents might have toddlers and pre-k kids that they have to stay with in the children’ section while their older kids find books in the young adult section.

      If the books were in a separate section, the parents could allow their older children to wander away 20 feet to the young adults section without having to hold a screaming to tell their child what is and is not acceptable for their child to pick up without seeing naked bodies and sex scenes that are placed like land mines in the young adults section.

      Do you see the dilemma? It is a request to accommodate those who are concerned that a visit to the library is potentially as bad as sticking playboy magazines at random on the book shelf and hoping their child doesn't accidentally pick that magazine up before the parent can scream “wait!!!” and stop them.

      It seems so common sense to move these books. It isn’t censorship. It is accommodating the entire community who have expressed deep concern.

      Delete
  10. SO PROUD to have a representative who cares about constituents and isn’t afraid to get things done! Thank you Rep. Gragg!!

    ReplyDelete